Re: Anon FTP server on Redhat - Uploads denied?

2000-02-11 Thread Tony Nugent
[Originally taken privately from a post to the vger linux-apps mailing list, but my reply might be of some use to others... Cc'ed into the redhat-devel mailing list - be warned that replies to that list will bounce unless you are already subscribed to it.] > On Fri, 11 Feb 2000, you wrot

Re: Anaconda, Corel and feeling discriminated

2000-02-11 Thread JF Martinez
Alan Cox wrote: > > > As to "instant firewalling"; any program which claims to provide instant > > firewalling is not going to provide well for a lot of cases. Firewalls > > You may be suprised. Lokkit seems to be handling all the 'end user' cases > thrown at it rather well. Certainly it cover

Re: Anaconda, Corel and feeling discriminated

2000-02-11 Thread Matt Fahrner
> To be honest, I'd find it to be a major PITA if every > machine I installed had to okay through a ppp config post install I don't think that's really what they're getting at. You don't need to make everything get configured at install time, just give an option so that it can, or better yet, a G

Re: Anaconda, Corel and feeling discriminated

2000-02-11 Thread Alan Cox
> As to "instant firewalling"; any program which claims to provide instant > firewalling is not going to provide well for a lot of cases. Firewalls You may be suprised. Lokkit seems to be handling all the 'end user' cases thrown at it rather well. Certainly it covers home user dialup, screening

Re: plead for documentation for changes in redhat 6.2

2000-02-11 Thread John Summerfield
> On Wed Feb 09 2000 at 23:47, George Karabin wrote: > > > > Can a CHANGES file be provided with this and every release (and > > > pre-releases) of a new distribution. In fact, two CHANGES files... > > Nice to see a reply so quickly. I hope this issue gets a fair bit of > debate (as this threa

Re: plead for documentation for changes in redhat 6.2

2000-02-11 Thread John Summerfield
> It can be a difficult and onerous task to rebuild lots of server and > client boxes up to a new distro version, or to try to integrate these > into existing infrastructures and configurations when some features > have changed (sometimes radically). To have some decent documentation > available

Re: plead for documentation for changes in redhat 6.2

2000-02-11 Thread John Summerfield
> Tony Nugent ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > > Can a CHANGES file be provided with this and every release (and > > pre-releases) of a new distribution. In fact, two CHANGES files... > > There will be something along these lines with 6.2 final. I'm > not sure it will necessarily go into all the det

RPM and packaging (was: Re: plead for documentation for changes in redhat 6.2)

2000-02-11 Thread Ingo Luetkebohle
Bill, thanks for the post. I think that the document is definetely a step in the right direction. On Thu, Feb 10, 2000 at 10:44:20AM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > - The various BSD-based network services (telnet, finger, talk, > rsh, ruers, rwall, tftp) have been split into client and > s

FTP doesn't work!!!

2000-02-11 Thread Enrico Morelli
Dear all, I cannot connect to PC RH 5.2 or 6.1 using ftp from normal user. I can only like anonymous. The error is: 530 Login incorrect. Login failed All login doesn't work. I haven't modified the ftp files in /etc. Any suggestion? Thanks. Enrico -- To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe [