[RE-wrenches] 310.15(A)(2) Exception

2011-08-17 Thread Brian Mehalic
Question about the 10'/10% rule - the exception states "adjacent portions of a circuit." How does this apply to an underground conduit run, where there are two ends exposed to higher ambient temperatures than the length in the ground? For example, what if there is 100 feet in the trench, and 7 fe

Re: [RE-wrenches] 310.15(A)(2) Exception

2011-08-17 Thread Dave Click
As I read the rule, that 100' in the trench allows you to go 10' above grade on each side while just worrying about the ampacity in the 100' section (be sure to check that your terminals are OK). For 200' in the trench, you're still looking at 10' above grade on each side. The rule doesn't say

[RE-wrenches] working spaces for disconnects and meter sockets

2011-08-17 Thread August Goers
Hi Wrenches - Does anyone know what the specific working clearance requirements are for disconnects switches (there might be a difference between fused and non-fused) and meter sockets? I've historically gone by the typical conservative approach found in NEC 110.26, ie 3' in front and 30" wid

Re: [RE-wrenches] 310.15(A)(2) Exception

2011-08-17 Thread Drake
I think this answers a question I was pondering. If a conduit is run on standoffs over a roof, the temperature is cooler than on the roof, so the derating of the wire's ampacity is less. It would appear from 310.15(A)(2) Exception that it would not be necessary to limit the ampacity of the