-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org
[mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of JRQ
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 8:28 PM
To: RE-wrenches
Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Snow loads
Gary,
The snow loads that structural engineers design to are a worst-case scenario.
It is true that
highly recommend
you have a structural engineer review the structure, even if a structural stamp
is not required.
Jeffrey Quackenbush
From: Bob-O Schultze
To: RE-wrenches
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 3:00 PM
Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Snow loads
I would
about 10 years ago - after a particularly heavy duty (more than usual) mount
shasta snow storm, the county raised the snow load specifications here from
40#/sq ft to 60#/sq ft... which made all existing roofs substandard, so while
they are grandfathered in, adding 2 to 3 #/sq ft for solar is
lgoodssolar.com
From: re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org
[mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of Gary Bassett
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 1:48 PM
To: re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org
Subject: [RE-wrenches] Snow loads
Has anyone in the snow belt areas hav
.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of Gary Bassett
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 1:48 PM
To: re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org
Subject: [RE-wrenches] Snow loads
Has anyone in the snow belt areas have any luck with convincing their local
building inspectors that the snow melts or slides from panels, mu
Has anyone in the snow belt areas have any luck with convincing their local
building inspectors that the snow melts or slides from panels, much like a
metal roof only better. Thus your snow load would be reduced to zero where the
panels have been installed.
Gary
__
6 matches
Mail list logo