-wrenches
Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] GEC for Micro-Inverters and ACPV Modules
Dear John and Brian
Thanks for a great discussion.
My question is:
If you used a WEEB to connect the inverter to the rail, is the rack
rail listed as a GEC?
Or does it have to be listed as a GEC?
Thanks
Jay
Peltz power
ednesday, January 16, 2013 8:52 PM
*To:* RE-wrenches
*Subject:* Re: [RE-wrenches] GEC for Micro-Inverters and ACPV Modules
Dear John and Brian
Thanks for a great discussion.
My question is:
If you used a WEEB to connect the inverter to the rail, is the rack
rail listed as a GEC?
Or does it ha
-wrenches.org
[mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of jay peltz
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 8:52 PM
To: RE-wrenches
Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] GEC for Micro-Inverters and ACPV Modules
Dear John and Brian
Thanks for a great discussion.
My question is:
If you used a
Dear John and Brian
Thanks for a great discussion.
My question is:
If you used a WEEB to connect the inverter to the rail, is the rack rail listed
as a GEC?
Or does it have to be listed as a GEC?
Thanks
Jay
Peltz power
Sent from my iPad
On Jan 16, 2013, at 12:09 PM, Brian Wiley wrote
Behalf Of Mark Frye
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 10:08 AM
To: re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org
Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] GEC for Micro-Inverters and ACPV Modules
I believe the WEEB is a great product for
producing equipment grounds. But for producing a
GEC I don't see it. Even if I bond
-wrenches.org [mailto:
re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] *On Behalf Of *Brian Wiley
*Sent:* Tuesday, January 15, 2013 1:02 PM
*To:* RE-wrenches
*Subject:* Re: [RE-wrenches] GEC for Micro-Inverters and ACPV Modules
Hi August,
I maintain that the WEEB is an irreversible splice.
If you want
Or often science
Jay
Peltz power
Sent from my iPad
On Jan 16, 2013, at 6:50 AM, Drake wrote:
> That is an interesting point. The Code issue is one of definition, not of
> function or safety.
>
> At 04:02 PM 1/15/2013, you wrote:
>> Hi August,
>>
>> I maintain that the WEEB is an irrevers
--
From:
<mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org>re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org
[mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of John
Berdner
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 7:07 PM
To: RE-wrenches
Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] GEC for Micro-Inverters and ACPV Mod
, January 14, 2013 7:07 PM
To: RE-wrenches
Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] GEC for Micro-Inverters and ACPV Modules
August:
The WEEB or other Listed grounding means between the inverter case and the
structure are not "contiguous or irreversible spliced" and therefore do
not meet the
y 14, 2013 7:07 PM
To: RE-wrenches
Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] GEC for Micro-Inverters and ACPV Modules
August:
The WEEB or other Listed grounding means between the inverter case and the
structure are not "contiguous or irreversible spliced" and therefore do not
meet the requirements for a GEC
address.)
T: 510.498.3201 ext 747
M: 530.277.4894
-Original Message-
From: re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org
[mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of August
Goers
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 4:32 PM
To: RE-wrenches
Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] GEC for Micro-Inverter
gt; From: re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org
> [mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of Mark
> Frye
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 3:31 PM
> To: RE-wrenches
> Subject: [RE-wrenches] GEC for Micro-Inverters and ACPV Modules
>
> Does anyone have the l
iring without damage or destruction to
the conductors and connectors.
Dan Lepinski, Senior Engineer
Exeltech / Exeltech Solar Products
--- On Mon, 1/14/13, Mark Frye wrote:
> From: Mark Frye
> Subject: [RE-wrenches] GEC for Micro-Inverters and ACPV Modules
> To: "RE-wrenches"
bject: [RE-wrenches] GEC for Micro-Inverters and ACPV Modules
Does anyone have the latest on the GEC for micro-inverters/ACPV issue?
I know it is still in NEC 2008 and I believe 2011 with plans to address it in
2014.
I am specifically interested in the issue of GEC means continues (irreversible
sp
747
M: 530.277.4894
-Original Message-
From: re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org
[mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of August Goers
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 4:32 PM
To: RE-wrenches
Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] GEC for Micro-Inverters and ACPV Modules
Hi Ma
-
From: re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org
[mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of Mark Frye
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 3:31 PM
To: RE-wrenches
Subject: [RE-wrenches] GEC for Micro-Inverters and ACPV Modules
Does anyone have the latest on the GEC for micro-inverters/
riginal Message-
From: re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org
[mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of Mark Frye
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 3:31 PM
To: RE-wrenches
Subject: [RE-wrenches] GEC for Micro-Inverters and ACPV Modules
Does anyone have the latest on th
Does anyone have the latest on the GEC for micro-inverters/ACPV issue?
I know it is still in NEC 2008 and I believe 2011 with plans to address
it in 2014.
I am specifically interested in the issue of GEC means continues
(irreversible splices) and the whole business of the DC side of these
de
18 matches
Mail list logo
