Re: [RE-wrenches] conductors and the 120% rule

2014-03-04 Thread Kirk
Is this a code change in 2014 vs 2011 or merely a clarification? Vt has not adopted 2014 yet. What was the original rationale for the 120% rule to apply to conductors in addition to a panel bus? Kirk Herander VSE > On Mar 4, 2014, at 6:20 PM, Brian Mehalic wrote: > > If the subpanel is at th

Re: [RE-wrenches] conductors and the 120% rule

2014-03-04 Thread Brian Mehalic
If the subpanel is at the end if the feeder, and there are no taps in between the main and the sub then I don't see any reason that the conductors need to be any larger than 200 A as there is no where on the feeder conductors where grid and PV current will be additive. The changes in 705.12 in

Re: [RE-wrenches] conductors and the 120% rule

2014-03-04 Thread Kirk Herander
Solaredge 20 kw, 480 3-phase. Good point, but that may be irrelevant. The feed-in subpanel is also powering unrelated loads, which use the neutral as a conductor from the main panel. So 4 conductors from the main. Kirk Herander VT Solar, LLC dba Vermont Solar Engineering NABCEPTM Certified I

Re: [RE-wrenches] conductors and the 120% rule

2014-03-04 Thread Kirk Herander
The other thing I could do is downsize the main to 190 amps or less. 190 + 60(pv) = 250 / 1.2 = 208 amps, exactly the 4/0 derate amperage. Unfortunately I can't get away with downsizing the 60 amp pv breaker, unless I could find a breaker rated to operate continuously at greater than 80% of its tr

Re: [RE-wrenches] conductors and the 120% rule

2014-03-04 Thread Allen Frishman
what inverter(s) are you using?In many cases the Neutral is not considered a Current Carying Conductor by the Manufacturer and therefore you only have 3 CCC. Al Frishman AeonSolar (917) 699-6641 - cell (888) 460-2867 www.aeonsolar.com On Mar 4, 2014, at 4:20 PM, Kirk Herander wrote: > App

Re: [RE-wrenches] conductors and the 120% rule

2014-03-04 Thread Kirk Herander
Approx.. 50 - 60ft. Kirk Herander VT Solar, LLC dba Vermont Solar Engineering NABCEPTM Certified Inaugural Certificant NYSERDA-eligible Installer VT RE Incentive Program Partner 802.863.1202 From: re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org [mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.

Re: [RE-wrenches] conductors and the 120% rule

2014-03-04 Thread Jason Szumlanski
Yeah, I assumed you meant the four conductors. The exception would solve your problem if it's physically possible. How long of a run are we talking about? The cost difference shouldn't be bad for a short distance. Jason Szumlansk i Fafco Solar On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Kirk Herander w

Re: [RE-wrenches] conductors and the 120% rule

2014-03-04 Thread Ray Walters
What is the length of the conduit to the subpanel? That will determine whether to apply the derates. R.Ray Walters CTO, Solarray, Inc Nabcep Certified PV Installer, Licensed Master Electrician Solar Design Engineer 303 505-8760 On 3/4/2014 1:34 PM, Kirk Herander wrote:

Re: [RE-wrenches] conductors and the 120% rule

2014-03-04 Thread Kirk Herander
Whether or not a further derate has to be applied is the killer here, as I am working with existing panels and conductors. In an old Code Corner(HP140) J. Wiles goes through a similar scenario and calls out the allowable current rating and conductor in 310.15, but makes no mention of applying addit

Re: [RE-wrenches] conductors and the 120% rule

2014-03-04 Thread Jason Szumlanski
Both the bus and conductors need to be rated for 217 amps minimum. As you mentioned, the bus is not a problem. The way I interpret it, the conductor size required would be after derate factors are applied. The rating of the conductor is ultimately dependent on the derate factors. If you can locate

Re: [RE-wrenches] conductors and the 120% rule

2014-03-04 Thread Chris Mason
The conductors have to be rated for 200A as normal. Fault current can only come from the grid. While the total available current on the bus of a panel is the total of the source breakers, in the conductors, grid and solar power cancel out and the total is not the sum of the two. On Tue, Mar 4, 20

[RE-wrenches] conductors and the 120% rule

2014-03-04 Thread Kirk Herander
Hello, I have a 225 amp 3-phase main lug sub-panel protected by a 200 amp breaker. My inverter breaker feeding the sub panel is 60 amps. So 225 a bus x 1.2 = 270 amps. That's less than the sum of the two breakers of 260 amps, so no issue there. The conductors between sub and main panel have to be