Is this a code change in 2014 vs 2011 or merely a clarification? Vt has not 
adopted 2014 yet. What was the original rationale for the 120% rule to apply to 
conductors in addition to a panel bus? 

Kirk Herander
VSE

> On Mar 4, 2014, at 6:20 PM, Brian Mehalic <br...@solarenergy.org> wrote:
> 
> If the subpanel is at the end if the feeder, and there are no taps in between 
> the main and the sub then I don't see any reason that the conductors need to 
> be any larger than 200 A as there is no where on the feeder conductors where 
> grid and PV current will be additive. 
> 
> The changes in 705.12 in 2014 address this in large part. 
> 
> Brian
> 
>> On Mar 4, 2014, at 2:41 PM, "Kirk Herander" <k...@vtsolar.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Solaredge 20 kw, 480 3-phase. Good point, but that may be irrelevant. The 
>> feed-in subpanel is also powering unrelated loads, which use the neutral as 
>> a conductor from the main panel. So 4 conductors from the main.
>>  
>> Kirk Herander
>> VT Solar, LLC
>> dba Vermont Solar Engineering
>> NABCEPTM Certified Inaugural Certificant
>> NYSERDA-eligible Installer
>> VT RE Incentive Program Partner
>> 802.863.1202
>>  
>> From: re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org 
>> [mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of Allen 
>> Frishman
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 4:32 PM
>> To: RE-wrenches
>> Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] conductors and the 120% rule
>>  
>> what inverter(s) are you using?    In many cases the Neutral is not 
>> considered a Current Carying Conductor by the Manufacturer and therefore you 
>> only have 3 CCC.
>> Al Frishman
>> AeonSolar
>> (917) 699-6641 - cell
>> (888) 460-2867
>> www.aeonsolar.com
>>  
>> On Mar 4, 2014, at 4:20 PM, Kirk Herander wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Approx.. 50 – 60ft.
>>  
>> Kirk Herander
>> VT Solar, LLC
>> dba Vermont Solar Engineering
>> NABCEPTM Certified Inaugural Certificant
>> NYSERDA-eligible Installer
>> VT RE Incentive Program Partner
>> 802.863.1202
>>  
>> From: re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org 
>> [mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of Ray Walters
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 4:05 PM
>> To: RE-wrenches
>> Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] conductors and the 120% rule
>>  
>> What is the length of the conduit to the subpanel? That will determine 
>> whether to apply the derates.
>> 
>> 
>> R.Ray Walters
>> CTO, Solarray, Inc
>> Nabcep Certified PV Installer, 
>> Licensed Master Electrician
>> Solar Design Engineer
>> 303 505-8760
>> On 3/4/2014 1:34 PM, Kirk Herander wrote:
>> Whether or not a further derate has to be applied is the killer here, as I 
>> am working with existing panels and conductors. In an old Code Corner(HP140) 
>> J. Wiles goes through a similar scenario and calls out the allowable current 
>> rating and conductor in 310.15, but makes no mention of applying additional 
>> derate factors. The .8 derate for 4-6 conductors(l1,l2,l3, & n) will put the 
>> existing 4/0 cable between feed-in and main panel at 208 amps, less than the 
>> allowable 217. I’d hate to need to upsize the wire to 250 mcm.
>>  
>> Kirk Herander
>> VT Solar, LLC
>> dba Vermont Solar Engineering
>> NABCEPTM Certified Inaugural Certificant
>> NYSERDA-eligible Installer
>> VT RE Incentive Program Partner
>> 802.863.1202
>>  
>> From: re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org 
>> [mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of Jason 
>> Szumlanski
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 2:57 PM
>> To: RE-wrenches
>> Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] conductors and the 120% rule
>>  
>> Both the bus and conductors need to be rated for 217 amps minimum. As you 
>> mentioned, the bus is not a problem. The way I interpret it, the conductor 
>> size required would be after derate factors are applied. The rating of the 
>> conductor is ultimately dependent on the derate factors.
>>  
>> If you can locate your subpanel adjacent to the main distribution panel, you 
>> may be able to use Exception #3 to 310.15(B)(2) by connecting the panels 
>> with a short nipple. I assume you are just looking at a number of conductor 
>> derate and not an ambient temperature derate.
>>  
>> Jason Szumlanski
>> Fafco Solar
>> 
>>  
>> <image001.jpg>
>>  
>> 
>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Kirk Herander <k...@vtsolar.com> wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I have a 225 amp 3-phase main lug sub-panel protected by a 200 amp breaker. 
>> My inverter breaker feeding the sub panel is 60 amps. So 225 a bus x 1.2 = 
>> 270 amps. That’s less than the sum of the two breakers of 260 amps, so no 
>> issue there. The conductors between sub and main panel have to be rated for 
>> at least 260/1.2 = 217 amps, correct? Is this 217 amps before or after 
>> derating the conductor?
>>  
>>  
>> Kirk Herander
>> VT Solar, LLC
>> dba Vermont Solar Engineering
>> NABCEPTM Certified Inaugural Certificant
>> NYSERDA-eligible Installer
>> VT RE Incentive Program Partner
>> 802.863.1202
>>  
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> List sponsored by Home Power magazine
>>  
>> List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org
>>  
>> Change email address & settings:
>> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>>  
>> List-Archive: 
>> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>>  
>> List rules & etiquette:
>> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
>>  
>> Check out participant bios:
>> www.members.re-wrenches.org
>>  
>>  
>> _______________________________________________
>> List sponsored by Home Power magazine
>> 
>> List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org
>> 
>> Change email address & settings:
>> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>> 
>> List-Archive: 
>> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>> 
>> List rules & etiquette:
>> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
>> 
>> Check out participant bios:
>> www.members.re-wrenches.org
>> 
>>  
>> _______________________________________________
>> List sponsored by Home Power magazine
>> 
>> List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org
>> 
>> Change email address & settings:
>> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>> 
>> List-Archive: 
>> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>> 
>> List rules & etiquette:
>> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
>> 
>> Check out participant bios:
>> www.members.re-wrenches.org
> _______________________________________________
> List sponsored by Home Power magazine
> 
> List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org
> 
> Change email address & settings:
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
> 
> List-Archive: 
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
> 
> List rules & etiquette:
> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
> 
> Check out participant bios:
> www.members.re-wrenches.org
> 
_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Change email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org

Reply via email to