200.6(D) mentions the separating and labeling of conductors of different systems
thumb through that one and you should be able to get a guy on your side.
I agree with the zip tie idea as a suitable partition and you see it everywhere.___
List sponsored
Hi Kirk,I believe this may be solved by good old definitions within 690. I do not have my 08 here as a Journeyman borrowed it to study, but these definitions have not changed, this is from 2011 NEC:Photovoltaic Source Circuit: Circuits between modules and from modules to the common connection point
Max, et al.
I've also found parallels to be clunky a couple of years ago as well. Rumored
that the new version is catching up to VMWare.
Even when VMWare first came out, it was a little slow to boot the OS- aka,
Windows XP.
They've made some great strides since then, so perhaps consider an upg
I've got Parallels on my iMac also - yes it's too clunky to be useful.
Draftsight is working out great for Cad Dwgs on the Mac, and, again, it's a
free
download...
Max Balchowsky
Design Engineer
SEE Systems
1048 Irvine Ave Suite 217
Newport Beach, Ca. 92660
760-403-6810
___
Kirk, we put a 4x4 gutter under the equipment (inverters, disconnects, AC and
DC, if not using an Inverter with the DC disc integrated)
it looks neater and then you tie wrap the DC together And AC together in the
gutter. 3/4 inch conduit risers to the equipment from the gutter and you have a
nea
Dan:
Just to be clear, I am not suggesting that Kirk draw anything. I suggest he
refer to the drawing identified as Figure 690.1(B) in the 2008 NEC.
If the inspector will still not accept the facts, there is usually an
appeal process.
I'm all for being polite, but I am also in favor of not
Kirk,
Show an ohmic connection between the main panel, the
sub-panel, and and the inverter output, you've met the
burden of proof pertaining to the "connected together"
aspect of the NEC, and thus the allowance for the sets
of conductors to co-exist in the same conduit.
Politely point out that th
My situation does not concern AC and DC in the same raceway. It concerns an
AC conductor from the utility main panel to a load subpanel, and a separate
AC inverter output from an inverter combiner panel, back to the main panel,
not being allowed in the same conduit - at least that's the interpretat
Kirk:
When you say inverter combiner, I am confident you mean the device
combining the AC output conductors of multiple inverters.
I got the same jive from an over zealous inspector once, but he and your
inspector are just plain wrong. Examine and show them the diagram in the
code book of
9 matches
Mail list logo
