Dan:
Just to be clear, I am not suggesting that Kirk draw anything. I suggest he
refer to the drawing identified as Figure 690.1(B) in the 2008 NEC.
If the inspector will still not accept the facts, there is usually an
appeal process.
I'm all for being polite, but I am also in favor of not letting an ignorant
inspector take advantage of me or my clients.
William
At 05:50 AM 4/10/2011, you wrote:
William's suggestion for a clearly drawn one-line
is also excellent.
In the end, however, as we all know, it's the AHJ's
interpretation that prevails (right or wrong).
Dan
--- On Sun, 4/10/11, Kirk Herander, VSE <k...@vtsolar.com> wrote:
> From: Kirk Herander, VSE <k...@vtsolar.com>
> Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] 690.4 (B) ???
> To: conr...@cape.com, "'RE-wrenches'"
> <re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org>
> Date: Sunday, April 10, 2011, 7:26 AM
> My situation does not concern AC and DC in the same
> raceway. It concerns an AC conductor from the utility
> main panel to a load subpanel, and a separate AC
> inverter output from an inverter combiner panel, back
> to the main panel, not being allowed in the same
> conduit - at least that's the interpretation
> of 690.4(B) of the 2008 NEC by my inspector.
>
> Kirk Herander
> Vermont Solar Engineering
> 802.863.1202
> NABCEP(tm) Certified Solar Installer
> NYSERDA-eligible Installer
> VT Solar Incentive Program Partner
_______________________________________________
William Miller
Miller Solar
Voice :805-438-5600
email: will...@millersolar.com
http://millersolar.com
License No. C-10-773985
_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine
List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org
Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org
