Re: [RBW] Re: Freewheel hypothetical

2011-07-13 Thread Steve Palincsar
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 20:54 -0600, PATRICK MOORE wrote: > Tell me where I can find IGHs that will give me 50-60-and 70" gears > and I'll buy out the entire stock! Back years ago, Sturmey Archer made some narrow range 3 speeds. The AM comes very close to what you want, giving 115.55, 100 and 86.54

Re: [RBW] Re: Freewheel hypothetical

2011-07-12 Thread Michael_S
I guess I fall into the same window as most everyone. I like a 12 at the top end for long downhills in a 48 or 50t big ring and a 30 at the bottom for those long climbs at the end o' the day in the 24-28 granny. I like to spin on the climbs so I'm a triple rider for life in my preferred mountai

Re: [RBW] Re: Freewheel hypothetical

2011-07-12 Thread PATRICK MOORE
Tell me where I can find IGHs that will give me 50-60-and 70" gears and I'll buy out the entire stock! Here is what you get with an AW: If your 70" gear is the middle or direct drive, your high will be a useless 93", your low an excessively far away 53". If your high is 70", your middle will be

Re: [RBW] Re: Freewheel hypothetical

2011-07-12 Thread PATRICK MOORE
I've scored a stash of half a dozen 14-28 5 speeds (the Herse has a Stronglight 99 with 42/32 rings on it and the 42/17 #2 cog is the ideal cruising gear for the Herse at 67") and the rest is gravy. The 13-15-17-20-24-28 Ultra six on it now is even better since the 42/15 is a nice tailwind or "feel