Re: [RBW] Fendering the 'un-fenderable'

2010-06-07 Thread Steve Palincsar
On Mon, 2010-06-07 at 17:41 -0700, Stuart Fletcher wrote: > Mafac Racers are cheap and plentiful, and set up correctly (which > isn't terribly difficult, though maybe a dying art) they're fantastic > brakes. Sure Pauls are a lot nicer, but if you want to try a waaay > cheaper solution to see if i

Re: [RBW] Fendering the 'un-fenderable'

2010-06-07 Thread Bruce
Or try a 650B conversion? From: Stuart Fletcher To: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com Sent: Mon, June 7, 2010 7:41:14 PM Subject: Re: [RBW] Fendering the 'un-fenderable' Personally (not to mention self-evidently) I'd do what I did before I

Re: [RBW] Fendering the 'un-fenderable'

2010-06-07 Thread Stuart Fletcher
Question asker, all: On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 15:55, dos.ruedas wrote: > I have an old Trek 500 - series frame that I converted to be my light > touring/loaded commuter bike and while I love almost everything about > it, the one drawback is that I cannot fit fenders under the sidepull > brakes with

Re: [RBW] Fendering the 'un-fenderable'

2010-06-07 Thread Eric Norris
I would hazard to guess that a bike shop in San Francisco would have come up with a different name for this product. --Eric Sent from my iPad >> > I think you are thinking of the River City Reach Arounds > http://rivercitybicycles.com/product/reacharound-fender-brackets-737.htm > to go over th

Re: [RBW] Fendering the 'un-fenderable'

2010-06-07 Thread Steve Palincsar
On Mon, 2010-06-07 at 15:55 -0700, dos.ruedas wrote: > I have an old Trek 500 - series frame that I converted to be my light > touring/loaded commuter bike and while I love almost everything about > it, the one drawback is that I cannot fit fenders under the sidepull > brakes with the 32mm tires I