Not whining and complaining on the internet???
Does not compute.
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 5:45 AM, EricP wrote:
> Yup. Pretty awfully close to the way my mind's eye wants mine to look
> when it's done.
>
> When first reading about the possible change, wanted to go into Sam
> the Eagle mode and
I tell ya, that 58 looks pitch perfect!!!
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 10:35 PM, Esteban wrote:
> While we're on the topic...
>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/25671...@n02/4488993610/
>
> Esteban
> San Diego, Calif.
>
> On Apr 3, 9:36 pm, Ron MH wrote:
> > Yeah, the voice of reason!
> >
> > On Apr 3,
I'm all for a second top tube... just one parallel to the other one. Having
laterals just seems like waay overkill. I guess for heavy-leaded
expedition touring to Siberia it makes sense, but for the other 99.5% of the
time...
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 7:55 PM, CycloFiend wrote:
> on 4/3/10 5
on 4/3/10 5:22 PM, cyclotourist at cyclotour...@gmail.com wrote:
I question how many Bombadil frames are cracking in half due to lack of
stiffness.
Well arguably, "stiffness" is what would cause things to crack in half -
an inability to transfer force so it gets concentrated to one specific a
I question how many Bombadil frames are cracking in half due to lack of
stiffness.
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 6:03 PM, EricP wrote:
> Well, if not a joke, not sure what to think. The idea makes some
> sense. Especially if it starts to approximate the twin lateral design
> of the original Breezers
I think it will be diagonal like the top tube of a mixte.
-Original Message-
From: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
[mailto:rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Matt Critchlow
Sent: Saturday, April 03, 2010 9:53 AM
To: RBW Owners Bunch
Subject: [RBW] Re: hunqapillar 2nd top-tub
It's a small-small-small-small world.
It's a small world...
Oh, sorry.
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 11:41 AM, William wrote:
> Interesting the Harry Hugel is a commenter on the Alex Singer example.
>
> My hypothetical 54 will not be affected, either way
>
> On Apr 3, 10:20 am, newenglandbike wrote:
I like the parallel tubes. Kinda' looks kewl. I could see the necessity
(possibly) of diagonal bracing on the real large sizes, but seems like
parallel double TTs are fine for the 58 size (which happens to be what I
would need).
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Matt Critchlow wrote:
> I did see
