On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Seth Vidal wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 12:55 PM, cyclotourist
> wrote:
> > That's what I presumed on looking at it. Cool that you have one! I
> wonder
> > if a modern builder (Bilenky??) could correct for that without having to
> > over build it. I love t
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 12:55 PM, cyclotourist wrote:
> That's what I presumed on looking at it. Cool that you have one! I wonder
> if a modern builder (Bilenky??) could correct for that without having to
> over build it. I love the design, but would need it to be tough enough and
> not crazy f
That's what I presumed on looking at it. Cool that you have one! I wonder
if a modern builder (Bilenky??) could correct for that without having to
over build it. I love the design, but would need it to be tough enough and
not crazy flexy...
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 12:44 PM, cyclotourist wrote:
> That is the coolest design ever!
>
> Anyone know if there are downsides to a frame built like that? Is it super
> flexy or overbuilt to reduce flexiness? Tough enough for bouncing around on
> trails/fire roads???
>
I suspect that is either
That is the coolest design ever!
Anyone know if there are downsides to a frame built like that? Is it super
flexy or overbuilt to reduce flexiness? Tough enough for bouncing around on
trails/fire roads???
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 9:32 AM, bfd wrote:
> On SF CL, there's a "french" mixte tandem
On SF CL, there's a "french" mixte tandem for $650:
http://sfbay.craigslist.org/sfc/bik/2074149973.html
Doesn't say who build the bike or the size, but at that price, it
might be a decent deal. Good Luck!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners
