On Sat, 2010-09-25 at 13:34 -0700, Kathryn Hall wrote:
> I'm sure you know this, but to summarize, tread depends on model of
> crank and bottom bracket width, which in turn is dependent on
> clearance at the chain stays. What I can say from my experience is
> that the narrowest tread can be had wi
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Kathryn Hall wrote:
> I'm sure you know this, but to summarize, tread depends on model of crank
> and bottom bracket width, which in turn is dependent on clearance at the
> chain stays. What I can say from my experience is that the narrowest tread
> can be had wit
I'm sure you know this, but to summarize, tread depends on model of crank
and bottom bracket width, which in turn is dependent on clearance at the
chain stays. What I can say from my experience is that the narrowest tread
can be had with a TA Pro 5 Vis or VO Grand Cru crank providing the chain
sta
Andrew, ITB pain sucks! I'm slowly digging out of my ITB pain cave. I
think your cranks may be too long. 175 on a MTB with varied speed and
revolutions is different than a constant spin on the road That's what I
found out for myself.
What I did: lowered saddle by 3-5mm, moved EXCLUSIVELY to S
The stock bb and XD2 on my Sam Hill had a Q of just about 160 mm
(which is just about as much as I can tolerate; adding MKS touring
pedals, with their relatively wide platform and relatively wide gap
between arm and cage, made the Q unwieldy). Fortunately, the same bb
and cranset (170s in my case)
hi folks,
i'm looking at building up my next Riv in some road-ish configuration for a
fast/light trainer.. this will probably going to be based on a canti-Rom (or a
Roadeo), and i want to make good choices to help alleviate some knee problems
i've had with my Sam Hillborne.
the Sam has a Sugin
