On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 4:35 PM, Jan Heine wrote:
>
> Thank you for understanding - and continuing to enjoy Bicycle Quarterly!
>
I understand, sort of, but will continue unable to enjoy BQ.
Tim
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" gro
We get quite a few requests for digital editions, and I understand the
appeal of that format.
The problem with different formats for Bicycle Quarterly is simple: We are
too small to offer multiple platforms. So we have to decide on a single
platform, which accrues the economies of scale that ma
I'd love to have them if they are still available.
EJG (Jason)
On Sunday, December 22, 2013 6:02:48 PM UTC-5, Linkbeak wrote:
>
> I am thinning the printed herd and would like these to go to someone who
> wants them. I have 13 issues of Bicycle Quarterly from Winter 2008 (vol. 7
> no. 2) throu
I decided to renew for 2 more years.
Thanks Jan, for the great magazine and charitable giving.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/hosJ3
Sold! Been meaning to subscribe for a while.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/Luj71MvfyZQJ.
To post to this group, send email to rbw
Ha, I was just wondering where I could post questions about the
Pedersen article
On Oct 1, 4:18 pm, Allan in Portland wrote:
> Hopefully this doesn't confuse anyone, it is unrelated to the blog
> except for the timing, there's also a new google group for Bicycle
> Quarterly readers.
>
> The
Interesting Jan.
I thought you were wrong and the Riv used the normal OS downtube, so I
measured my '99 JS Road Standard (the first generation Richard Sachs
designed lugs). Sure enough, the TT and DT are both 28.6(ish)mm so all
three main tubes are the same diameter. Huh...
Regards, Doug
On S
>Also, if I'm reading the results correctly from the Standard vs
>superlight vs oversize tubing correctly, it sounds like the Roadeo
>will be a well-received bike.
>Pretty sure the "superlight" used in that test is standard diameter (as is
>the "standard" ;^) The Roadeo will by light(er)weight b
Pretty sure the "superlight" used in that test is standard diameter (as is
the "standard" ;^) The Roadeo will by light(er)weight but still oversized
tubing. I don't think GP has done any standard diameter tubing designs
since RBW began...
Doug
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 7:45 AM, Seth Vidal wrote
