[RBW] Re: BB width question (going from double to triple)

2009-02-10 Thread Doug Peterson
A miss is as good as a mile. Looks like over an 1/8 inch, whoops, couple of millimeters. -Original Message- From: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com [mailto:rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Mike Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 8:50 PM To: RBW Owners Bunch Subject: [RBW] B

[RBW] Re: BB width question (going from double to triple)

2009-02-10 Thread MichaelH
Nice looking bike. That setup looks like it would work, but a shorter spindle would give you a lower Q and probably a better chain line. If you have a traditional bb, you could try a 107 spindle in it. OTOH, if it works for you.. why not just ride it. BTW, in going back to a double last year,

[RBW] Re: BB width question (going from double to triple)

2009-02-10 Thread Angus
Mike, This is certainly more than enough clearance. Most of my chainrings are closer to the chainstay, typically about half of the clearance you have. Angus On Feb 9, 10:49 pm, Mike wrote: > So I got my repaired and repainted Rambouillet back today and it looks > great. I'm really looking for

[RBW] Re: BB width question (going from double to triple)

2009-02-09 Thread alewy
I use an XD double on my Rambouillet and have had good results wiht a 107mm spindle. Art -Original Message- From: Mike To: RBW Owners Bunch Sent: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 8:49 pm Subject: [RBW] BB width question (going from double to triple) So I got my repaired and repainted Rambouil