--- Forwarded mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 20:40:13 +1000 (EST)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]:Non-member submission from [Bruno
Tiago Rodrigues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
>From mikem Mon Jul 3 20:40:09 2000
Received: by osca
hey
i'm still looking at this... last thing I done was to try to use
/usr/lib/security/pam_sample.so.1 as the PAM library (a sample dummy PAM)
with always_succeed as a flag. Now it does work so this might be a Solaris
problem...
- Original Message -
>
> hi there
>
> we've been trying to
On Mon, 3 Jul 2000, Hugh Irvine wrote:
> Radiator should only try to directly query the NAS if you are enforcing strict
> simultaneous use with a NasType set for your Client clauses. If you don't have
> a NasType set, it won't be queried.
The funny part here is it's querying NASes that _aren't_
I got the passlog file to only print the password
the user enters only if
it is a FAIL condition. It all works good except
that if they enter an invalid
username is doesnt log anything. Has anyone
implemented a way to pass the information into the log file on a username fail?
I would be hap
Hello Chris -
On Mon, 03 Jul 2000, Radiator wrote:
>
> I got the passlog file to only print the password the user enters only if
> it is a FAIL condition. It all works good except that if they enter an invalid
> username is doesnt log anything. Has anyone implemented a way to pass the
informa
Hello Joshua -
On Tue, 04 Jul 2000, Joshua M. Thompson wrote:
>
> On Mon, 3 Jul 2000, Hugh Irvine wrote:
>
> > Radiator should only try to directly query the NAS if you are enforcing strict
> > simultaneous use with a NasType set for your Client clauses. If you don't have
> > a NasType set, it
On Tue, 4 Jul 2000, Hugh Irvine wrote:
> Do you have Simultaneous-Use check items set for your users?
Yes they're coming out of my Auth module (they're a database field). I
could yank that out but then I'd be stuck forever unable to enforce
simultaneous use limits on my local numbers.
It seems
Hello Joshua -
On Tue, 04 Jul 2000, Joshua M. Thompson wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jul 2000, Hugh Irvine wrote:
>
> > Do you have Simultaneous-Use check items set for your users?
>
> Yes they're coming out of my Auth module (they're a database field). I
> could yank that out but then I'd be stuck forev
FYI...
This is also happening to me.. I am using a MySQL backend for accountig and
authentication
---
Edgar R Gutierrez
Head of Technical Operations
Impact Information Systems
Contact Number:+632 7296826
Mobile: +63917 9802340
- Original Message -
From: Joshua M. Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECT
On Tue, 4 Jul 2000, Hugh Irvine wrote:
> This is what it should do, however it is posting a warning to let you know. Is
> the real question "can I suppress the warning?"? If so, the answer at the
> moment is no, until we completely re-do the logging subsystem.
The logging itself doesn't bother m
Hello Joshua -
On Tue, 04 Jul 2000, Joshua M. Thompson wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jul 2000, Hugh Irvine wrote:
>
> > This is what it should do, however it is posting a warning to let you know. Is
> > the real question "can I suppress the warning?"? If so, the answer at the
> > moment is no, until we co
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: AuthFILE modification to do a realm-less lookup in the file
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 12:00:49 +0930
From: Simon Hackett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
We've modified AuthFILE.pm to teach it a new keyword, 'StripRealm',
for use inside statements.
Wha
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Performing a case-insensitive password match in a users file?
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 12:01:11 +0930
From: Simon Hackett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi folks (again!),
I'm transitioning various radius user files, each servicing a
different realm name,
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: choosing a default realm name based on the Called-Station-Id
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 12:00:33 +0930
From: Simon Hackett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hello, fellow Radiators,
We use a PreClientHook (shown below for interest), in order to do
something th
Hello Simon -
On Tue, 04 Jul 2000, Simon Hackett wrote:
> Hello, fellow Radiators,
>
> We use a PreClientHook (shown below for interest), in order to do
> something that we find highly useful here - using the called number
> as a match string to determine a default realm name.
>
> What the P
Hello Simon -
On Tue, 04 Jul 2000, Simon Hackett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We've modified AuthFILE.pm to teach it a new keyword, 'StripRealm',
> for use inside statements.
>
> What this does is tells AuthFILE to look for usernames in the user
> file specified after removing the rightmost realm from
On Tue, 04 Jul 2000, Simon Hackett wrote:
> Hi folks (again!),
>
> I'm transitioning various radius user files, each servicing a
> different realm name, into the one radiator setup at the moment.
>
> It's all working - as simply as using AuthBy FILE on each relevant
> radius file from each pre
17 matches
Mail list logo
