Hello Joshua -
On Tue, 04 Jul 2000, Joshua M. Thompson wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jul 2000, Hugh Irvine wrote:
>
> > Do you have Simultaneous-Use check items set for your users?
>
> Yes they're coming out of my Auth module (they're a database field). I
> could yank that out but then I'd be stuck forever unable to enforce
> simultaneous use limits on my local numbers.
>
I thought that was the case.
> It seems to me what needs to happen is a way to tell Radiator "If you
> can't find the NAS in the client list, default the type to 'ignore'".
>
This is what it should do, however it is posting a warning to let you know. Is
the real question "can I suppress the warning?"? If so, the answer at the
moment is no, until we completely re-do the logging subsystem.
> > The usual cause for this is lost Stop records which mean that the session
> > database does not get cleaned up properly.
>
> That's what I was figuring it's just that the number seems awfully high,
> especially considering that one of the remote servers is 12-15ms away (8
> hops). But I'm not terribly worried about it at the moment so long as it
> doesn't causes users to get locked out due to simultaneous use limits.
>
I think you may have to do some more investigation to ascertain under what
conditions the session database is not being correctly updated.
hth
Hugh
--
Radiator: the most portable, flexible and configurable RADIUS server
anywhere. SQL, proxy, DBM, files, LDAP, NIS+, password, NT, Emerald,
Platypus, Freeside, Interbiller, TACACS+, PAM, external, etc, etc.
Available on Unix, Linux, FreeBSD, Windows 95/98/2000, NT, MacOS X.
===
Archive at http://www.starport.net/~radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.
