(RADIATOR) Ascend Max Probs

2000-06-06 Thread Dean Brandt
Hi Guys, I noticed this in the FAQ: 71. My MAX sends authentication request for silly user names like "banner", "route1" etc By Default Ascend MAX wil try to configure itself at startup by asking for various configuraiton items from the Radius server. You can turn this behaviou

(RADIATOR) FramedGroup

2000-06-06 Thread Dean Brandt
Hi, I am trying to get differing ranges of IPs allocated to two different sets of clients. I have this in my cfg: Secret x NoDefault IgnoreAcctSignature FramedGroupBaseAddress 203.1.1.1 FramedGroupBaseAddress 203.2.2.2

Re: (RADIATOR) Ascend Max Probs

2000-06-06 Thread Hugh Irvine
On Tue, 06 Jun 2000, Dean Brandt wrote: > Hi Guys, > > I noticed this in the FAQ: > > 71. My MAX sends authentication request for silly user names like > "banner", "route1" etc > By Default Ascend MAX wil try to configure itself at startup by asking for > various configuraiton items from t

Re: (RADIATOR) Ascend Max Probs

2000-06-06 Thread Dean Brandt
Does that apply to a Max 1800 as well? On Tue, 6 Jun 2000, Hugh Irvine wrote: > On Tue, 06 Jun 2000, Dean Brandt wrote: > > Hi Guys, > > > > I noticed this in the FAQ: > > > > 71. My MAX sends authentication request for silly user names like > > "banner", "route1" etc > > By De

Re: (RADIATOR) Big problem with Radiator 2.15

2000-06-06 Thread Sergey Y. Afonin
On Mon, 5 Jun 2000 07:36:36 +0500, Alexey A. Shavaldin wrote: >I have occured a big problem with Radiator 2.15. It was purchased by Kraft-S, >JSC. Before all the questions concerning Radiator were solved by Dmitry Sorry, this problem was eliminated by glibc update. With respect, Sergey Y. Afoni

Re: (RADIATOR) FramedGroup

2000-06-06 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello Dean - On Tue, 06 Jun 2000, Dean Brandt wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to get differing ranges of IPs allocated to two > different sets of clients. > > I have this in my cfg: > > > Secret x > NoDefault > IgnoreAcctSignature > FramedGroupBas

Re: (RADIATOR) Weird Syslog Entries

2000-06-06 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hi Hugh, Ok, here's an open plea to anyone that knows how to turn it off on a Max 1800, please yell out :) Thanks On Tue, 6 Jun 2000, Hugh Irvine wrote: > On Tue, 06 Jun 2000, you wrote: > > Hi Hugh, > > > > The NoDefault entry in my cfg file seems to have cured

Re: (RADIATOR) FramedGroup

2000-06-06 Thread Dean Brandt
Hi Hugh, Trace 4 shows that the wrong IP address is being presented at the NAS: Jun 7 11:06:33 contender /usr/bin/radiusd[588]: Adding session for [EMAIL PROTECTED], 216.252.212.131, 20102 Jun 7 11:06:33 contender /usr/bin/radiusd[588]: Handling with Radius::AuthRADIUS Jun

(RADIATOR) Converting Dates to Unix format??

2000-06-06 Thread Colin Chan
Hi, I need to convert plain text dates to linux timestamp format, can this be done manually? I'm manually entering data into the mysql database and it seems as though the dates are stored in timestamp format eg: 959125652 is stored rather than a readable date, however this seems to convert to 05/2

Re: Fwd: (RADIATOR) radacct.cgi errors

2000-06-06 Thread rad
OK ... I've somehow got strict turned on by default. Happened when I added all the CPAN stuff. I assume that just adding "no strict" to radiusd and radacct.cgi won't completely cure it. How the hell do I remove strict as a default behavior? Can't find it documented anywhere ... Thanx - John

Re: (RADIATOR) FramedGroup

2000-06-06 Thread Hugh Irvine
On Wed, 07 Jun 2000, Dean Brandt wrote: > Hi Hugh, > > Trace 4 shows that the wrong IP address is being presented at the > NAS: > > > Where should I be looking now? > The correct syntax for using the FramedGroupBaseAddress aproach is this: > > > > RewriteUsername

Re: (RADIATOR) FramedGroup

2000-06-06 Thread Dean Brandt
Hi Hugh, Using FramedGroup 1 in the cfg produces exactly the same results. ie wrong IP allocated (the NAs allocates from the pool instead) and the logfile does not show any attempt to allocate from the group 1 pool. Regards On Wed, 7 Jun 2000, Hugh Irvine wrote: > On

Re: (RADIATOR) FramedGroup

2000-06-06 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hi Dean - On Wed, 07 Jun 2000, Dean Brandt wrote: > Hi Hugh, > > Using FramedGroup 1 in the cfg produces exactly the same > results. ie wrong IP allocated (the NAs allocates from the pool > instead) and the logfile does not show any attempt to allocate from the > group 1 pool. > I still