RE: (RADIATOR) Prepaid services

2000-04-28 Thread Ingvar Berg (ERA)
> -Original Message- > From: tom minchin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: den 28 april 2000 05:16 > To: Mark Jenks > Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Prepaid services > > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2000 at 09:23:41AM +1200, Mark Jenks wrote: > > I have radiator working for pre

(RADIATOR) Octet counters wrapping

2000-04-28 Thread Andrew Pollock
Hi guys, I was asked today about how Radiator handled really large octet counts. My understanding of this is the NAS is what sends the value, so if the NAS only has a 32-bit counter, then it has the limitation of 4 gigabytes before the counter wraps back to zero. Just wanted to check that my un

(RADIATOR) RADONLINE accounting problem

2000-04-28 Thread Mike McCauley
--- Forwarded mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 22:40:16 +1000 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]:Non-member submission from [Okan ARISU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] >From owner-radiator Fri Apr 28 22:40:11 2000 Received: (from uucp@loc

Re: (RADIATOR) Prepaid services

2000-04-28 Thread Rustam Povarov
On Fri, 28 Apr 2000, Mark Jenks wrote: > How can I force a session off after a predetermined amount of time...is > there a radius attribute for this ? If you use Cisco's debitcard IVR script, you can use following attribute: 'h323-credit-time=1800' - maximum 30 minutes of session Debitcard app

(RADIATOR) rejection precedence

2000-04-28 Thread Brian Keefe
Which takes precedence? AuthByPolicy ContinueWhileReject or user1 User-Password="user1" Auth-Type="Reject:discontinued service" That is, if the Auth-Type for a user is Reject under a policy of ContinueWhileReject, does the user get rejected or does authentication continue? Thanks, -- Brian

(RADIATOR) How to Bypass Authentication

2000-04-28 Thread Hai . Dh . Nguyen
Does anyone know how to set up Radiator so that it will bypass authentication, but it will still allocate IP addresses. It seems like IP address allocation is done in the AuthGeneric.pm file. If I don't use AuthGeneric.pm, no IP address allocation would be done. One way that I can think of is

(RADIATOR) AuthByLDAP: sample LDIF file?

2000-04-28 Thread Dave Kitabjian
I've seen the sample file, goodies/ldap.cfg. However, I'd be very greatful to anyone who could post for me examples of their: - ldap.cfg file being used in production - LDIF of a section of your LDAP db I want to see *real examples* of what kind of schema people are usin

Re: (RADIATOR) rejection precedence

2000-04-28 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello Brian - On Sat, 29 Apr 2000, Brian Keefe wrote: > Which takes precedence? > > AuthByPolicy ContinueWhileReject > > or > > user1 User-Password="user1" Auth-Type="Reject:discontinued service" > > > That is, if the Auth-Type for a user is Reject under a policy of > ContinueWhileReject, d

(RADIATOR) desperate: NAS port restrictions...

2000-04-28 Thread Brian Keefe
I cannot seem to get NAS port restrictions to work. I always get rejects. Does anyone have any ideas? Also, it appears the NAS-Address-Port-List must be last, else the remainder of the strings is considered part of the filename. Is this true? This is my FlatFile database entry: concentric User

Re: (RADIATOR) Octet counters wrapping

2000-04-28 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello Andrew - On Fri, 28 Apr 2000, Andrew Pollock wrote: > Hi guys, > > I was asked today about how Radiator handled really large octet counts. > > My understanding of this is the NAS is what sends the value, so if the NAS > only has a 32-bit counter, then it has the limitation of 4 gigabytes

Re: (RADIATOR) How to Bypass Authentication

2000-04-28 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello Nguyen - On Sat, 29 Apr 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Does anyone know how to set up Radiator so that it will bypass > authentication, > but it will still allocate IP addresses. > > It seems like IP address allocation is done in the AuthGeneric.pm file. If > I don't > use AuthGeneri

Re: (RADIATOR) desperate: NAS port restrictions...

2000-04-28 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello Brian - On Sat, 29 Apr 2000, Brian Keefe wrote: > I cannot seem to get NAS port restrictions to work. I always get rejects. > Does anyone have any ideas? > > Also, it appears the NAS-Address-Port-List must be last, else the remainder > of the strings is considered part of the filename. Is