yes
-- Original Message --
From: "Danny Whitesel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2000 17:43:27 -0500
>Are you referring to multi-link?
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Flint Support <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Title: Check item (Time) question for checkattribute
Hi there,
Is it possible to make the Time = "..." item containing an exception of Time period. On simple configurations the current method is usefull but I have a confusing configuration fo my users.
And the length of the field reaches t
Is it possible to authenticate off one datasource but account to another?
We would like to authenticate off of a Postgres database, which we do now,
but send the Accounting information to an MSSQL server.does
Radiator allow for this?
Brian
--
I posted earlier, and hacked up a Realm entry and was wondering if
something like this is doable:
#AcctLogFileName %L/%C/detail
PasswordLogFileName %L/password.log
AuthByPolicyContinueWhileAccept
# RewriteUsername s/^([^@]+).*/lc($1)/e
I apologize for this not being 100% on topic, but I have a feeling some
people on this list might have the answer I'm looking for.
I have Total Control rack that I inherited from another ISP we acquired.
I've set it up, I can dial in, everything is fine.
However, I get the weirdest Accounting p
On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, Andy Dills wrote:
>
> I apologize for this not being 100% on topic, but I have a feeling some
> people on this list might have the answer I'm looking for.
>
> I have Total Control rack that I inherited from another ISP we acquired.
> I've set it up, I can dial in, everything
On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, Brian wrote:
> What version of code do you run on the Total Control rack? Is this
> netserver or hiperarc based?
Netserver, and version 3.7.24. And, (should have done this earlier), now
that I look at the release notes for 3.8 it mentions:
d-2837 Fixed bug that would cause
>Is it possible to authenticate off one datasource but account to another?
>We would like to authenticate off of a Postgres database, which we do now,
>but send the Accounting information to an MSSQL server.does
>Radiator allow for this?
>
>Brian
Brian,
I asked that same exact quest
>
> So, now I have to annoy tech support untl they give me 3.8 :>
they should, since its a bug, but if not, let me know, and I can get it.
>
> > > Lastly, does anybody know of a mailing list for USR Total Control
> > > products?
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED], the definitive list for usr tc discus
Have you tried IgnoreAcctSignature in your portion?
Second:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, Andy Dills wrote:
>
> I apologize for this not being 100% on topic, but I have a feeling some
> people on this list might have the answer I'm looking for.
>
> I have Total Control rack that I i
On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, Andy Dills wrote:
> However, I get the weirdest Accounting packets from it. A user will
> connect, and then disconnect, but for days after, I still get Start-Stop
> and Accounting-On packets for the session!
The packet trace shows "Bad Authenticator". So Radiator isn't goin
On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, Steve Suehring wrote:
> Have you tried IgnoreAcctSignature in your portion?
That fixed it! Now I feel silly, because although I checked the faq and
the manual, I didn't see that.
Thanks,
Andy
Andy Dills
I have a new installation of Netscape dir Server 4.1 and am installing
Radiator on NT. I have the LDAP.CFG setup as shown below, and am trying to
test the authentication. I receive the error shown, and the program aborts.
I've looked at AuthLDAP2.pm and am unsure of exactly what its trying to do
Hello-
I'm having the following problem with people dialing in single channel
ISDN into Cisco AS5300. The reason I'm posting this to the Radiator list
is that the problem only started after we switched from Merit to Radiator.
For the past week I've been pursuing it from the Cisco end with no
lu
Hello Steve -
On Fri, 04 Feb 2000, Steve Suehring wrote:
> Hello-
>
> I'm having the following problem with people dialing in single channel
> ISDN into Cisco AS5300. The reason I'm posting this to the Radiator list
> is that the problem only started after we switched from Merit to Radiator.
>
Is their any significance in the different disconnect causes we receive from our
Ascends? We receive pppRcvTerminate and remoteEndhungup on a lot of sessions. if
anyone knows of reference for these that would be helpful also!
thanks
Frank
===
Archive at http://www.thesite.com.au/~radiator/
T
On Fri, 4 Feb 2000, Hugh Irvine wrote:
> What dictionary are you using? The standard Radiator dictionary specifies this:
>
> ATTRIBUTE Idle-Timeout28 integer
>
Ours is the same.
> And what about Service-Type? Cisco's are very picky about requiring a
> Service-Type that
Idle-timeouts only worked correctly on ISDN calls after 11.3(8.1)T or
later. We have these working correctly by passing something like this:
AddToReply Service-Type = Framed-User, \
Framed-Protocol = PPP, \
Framed-Routing = None, \
18 matches
Mail list logo
