On Tue, 4 Jul 2000, Jason Godsey wrote:
> Can you do:
>
> StripFromReply Simultaneous-Use
>
>
> or is StripFromReply only for AuthBy? This is just the first thing that
> popped into my head.
It wouldn't be pratical in this situation anyway; there are literally
hundreds of NASes I'd have to
PROTECTED]>
> To: Hugh Irvine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Problem with Simultaneous-Use and proxying
>
> On Tue, 4 Jul 2000, Hugh Irvine wrote:
>
> > This is what it should do, however it is posting a warning to let
Hello Joshua -
On Tue, 04 Jul 2000, Joshua M. Thompson wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jul 2000, Hugh Irvine wrote:
>
> > This is what it should do, however it is posting a warning to let you know. Is
> > the real question "can I suppress the warning?"? If so, the answer at the
> > moment is no, until we co
On Tue, 4 Jul 2000, Hugh Irvine wrote:
> This is what it should do, however it is posting a warning to let you know. Is
> the real question "can I suppress the warning?"? If so, the answer at the
> moment is no, until we completely re-do the logging subsystem.
The logging itself doesn't bother m
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2000 5:22 AM
Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Problem with Simultaneous-Use and proxying
> On Mon, 3 Jul 2000, Hugh Irvine wrote:
>
> > Radiator should only try to directly query the NAS if you are enforcing
strict
> > s
Hello Joshua -
On Tue, 04 Jul 2000, Joshua M. Thompson wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jul 2000, Hugh Irvine wrote:
>
> > Do you have Simultaneous-Use check items set for your users?
>
> Yes they're coming out of my Auth module (they're a database field). I
> could yank that out but then I'd be stuck forev
On Tue, 4 Jul 2000, Hugh Irvine wrote:
> Do you have Simultaneous-Use check items set for your users?
Yes they're coming out of my Auth module (they're a database field). I
could yank that out but then I'd be stuck forever unable to enforce
simultaneous use limits on my local numbers.
It seems
Hello Joshua -
On Tue, 04 Jul 2000, Joshua M. Thompson wrote:
>
> On Mon, 3 Jul 2000, Hugh Irvine wrote:
>
> > Radiator should only try to directly query the NAS if you are enforcing strict
> > simultaneous use with a NasType set for your Client clauses. If you don't have
> > a NasType set, it
On Mon, 3 Jul 2000, Hugh Irvine wrote:
> Radiator should only try to directly query the NAS if you are enforcing strict
> simultaneous use with a NasType set for your Client clauses. If you don't have
> a NasType set, it won't be queried.
The funny part here is it's querying NASes that _aren't_
Hello Joshua -
>
> I have a rather complex RADIUS server setup that is giving me problems. My
> core server is a Radiator 2.14.1 server talking to our MySQL database via
> a customer auth module. Talking to that, in additon to 20 or so NASes, are
> a Merit RADIUS server for our Merit customers
10 matches
Mail list logo
