For those reading this later: there's a bunch of useful information in Alex
Harsanyi's blog post and corresponding code:
https://alex-hhh.github.io/2019/11/custom-rackunit-test-runner.html
https://github.com/alex-hhh/ActivityLog2/blob/master/test/custom-test-runner.rkt
Shriram
--
You received t
> On May 23, 2020, at 08:53, Shriram Krishnamurthi wrote:
>
> Alex, thanks for that information. I'm going to go investigate that next.
Related to that, I just remembered the existence of rackunit/text-ui and
rackunit/gui, which implement two different reporters for RackUnit test
cases/suites.
> On May 22, 2020, at 18:47, Shriram Krishnamurthi wrote:
>
> As an aside, I'm not entirely sure what `test-log!` is there for. Presumably
> it's to record in the log "tests" run by operations that are not part of
> rackunit? I'm curious how people have used it.
Other people have answered othe
Hi Shriram,
I have a module, handy/test-more (https://pkgs.racket-lang.org/package/handy),
that I think does everything you want; the downside is that the
documentation is thorough but it's in the form of essay-style comment
sections instead of Scribble. Breaking that out into actual Scribble is
While Racket enables the construction of new frameworks and languages,
indeed encourages it, I think rackunit has proven its value and many of
us use it as a de factor standard. (Some also use Eli's test library,
because they enjoy the simpler syntax. But it's not quite ready and
I am ambiguous
On Friday, June 19, 2015, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> Is `rackunit` to be used for all core Racket testing, long-term?
>
>
Racketeers can use whatever they feel like imho.
> Is there any other Racket testing stuff on the horizon?
>
>
Not to my knowledge.
Jay
> (Reason for asking: I'm about to sta
6 matches
Mail list logo
