While Racket enables the construction of new frameworks and languages, indeed encourages it, I think rackunit has proven its value and many of us use it as a de factor standard. (Some also use Eli's test library, because they enjoy the simpler syntax. But it's not quite ready and I am ambiguous on syntax.)
I recommend sticking with rackunit -- Matthias On Jun 19, 2015, at 3:36 PM, Jay McCarthy <jay.mccar...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Friday, June 19, 2015, Neil Van Dyke <n...@neilvandyke.org> wrote: > Is `rackunit` to be used for all core Racket testing, long-term? > > > Racketeers can use whatever they feel like imho. > > Is there any other Racket testing stuff on the horizon? > > > Not to my knowledge. > > Jay > > (Reason for asking: I'm about to standardize unit/regression testing for a > large Racket-based system. I need to decide whether to build it upon > `rackunit` at some level.) > > Neil > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > -- > Jay McCarthy > http://jeapostrophe.github.io > > "Wherefore, be not weary in well-doing, > for ye are laying the foundation of a great work. > And out of small things proceedeth that which is great." > - D&C 64:33 > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
