Thank you, Philip. This is helpful.
On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 9:04 PM Philip McGrath
wrote:
> I can't think of "something similar in functional Racket" (of course you
> can write purely functional programs with racket/class, but I know what you
> mean). I think it would be fairly easy to implement
I can't think of "something similar in functional Racket" (of course you
can write purely functional programs with racket/class, but I know what you
mean). I think it would be fairly easy to implement "something similar,"
but I want to clarify what you have in mind, because augmentable methods
don'
Cool, thanks. I'll look into generics more. I've skimmed past them before
this but never really dug in.
On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 1:46 PM Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> I don't know what all is currently available for Racket[1], but two
> search keywords to slog through are "advice" and "aspect".
>
> Asp
I don't know what all is currently available for Racket[1], but two
search keywords to slog through are "advice" and "aspect".
Aspects and other framework-y interfaces can be good for extensibility
of a system. (But maybe try to make loosely-coupled reusable modules
that don't need it, as muc
4 matches
Mail list logo
