Cool, thanks. I'll look into generics more. I've skimmed past them before this but never really dug in.
On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 1:46 PM Neil Van Dyke <n...@neilvandyke.org> wrote: > I don't know what all is currently available for Racket[1], but two > search keywords to slog through are "advice" and "aspect". > > Aspects and other framework-y interfaces can be good for extensibility > of a system. (But maybe try to make loosely-coupled reusable modules > that don't need it, as much as practical.) When you don't have an > interface like that, but really-really need it, advice is sometimes a > lifesaver. > > Separately, your particular example suggests that Racket's generics > might do what you currently need to do. > > > [1] It seems a lot of researchy/experimenty independent Racket stuff is > not well-advertised. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
