Thank you, Siddhartha Kasivajhula, for expressing this.
I am an "ordinary" Racket user - I don't hack on Racket itself, I don't
even create DSLs (yet). But I care about Racket a lot, I tell people about
it, I write software in it, and I even contributed a small feature to a
racket package.
I was
I just want to add my words on behalf of the silent majority. I think it is
important to look for ways to empower people like Matthew Butterick who have
contributed significantly to the community and done much to raise the
profile
of the Racket language. While his code contributions are evident, we
2 matches
Mail list logo
