Thank you, Siddhartha Kasivajhula, for expressing this. I am an "ordinary" Racket user - I don't hack on Racket itself, I don't even create DSLs (yet). But I care about Racket a lot, I tell people about it, I write software in it, and I even contributed a small feature to a racket package.
I was glad to see the Apology email on the list. I think this is a good first step. And I very much understand this is a difficult situation. But I agree there is a crucial next element that is needed: a clear strategy on handling these issues in the future, a commitment to addressing the problem in addition accepting it exists. There are two links I would like to share: The Racket Friendly Environment Policy: https://racket-lang.org/friendly.html It says: > Unacceptable behavior will not be tolerated. (Where unacceptable behavior is defined it a page linked from the Policy.) And a blog post I saw the other day on Software Freedom Conservancy's blog: https://sfconservancy.org/blog/2021/apr/20/how-to-apologize/ I think it has many constructive points. Best, -- Yury Bulka https://mamot.fr/@setthemfree #NotOnFacebook Siddhartha Kasivajhula <skasi...@gmail.com> writes: > I just want to add my words on behalf of the silent majority. I think it is > important to look for ways to empower people like Matthew Butterick who have > contributed significantly to the community and done much to raise the > profile > of the Racket language. While his code contributions are evident, we should > also bear in mind that there is much of value that cannot be parsed by the > reader, and is not easy to evaluate. It takes a special sagacity to do the > kind > of community building that he has done, and I know I've been grateful to > read > some of his - relatively infrequent now - posts on this list in the past. > It's > heartening to see apologies from those involved. We all make mistakes, and > apologies are not easy. I hope that those familiar will also, based on an > honest appraisal of the facts and sincere reflection, take necessary steps > to > ensure that this kind of thing doesn't happen in the future. I hope and > believe > we can do more to help people feel welcome and encouraged, and in > particular, I > am sure I speak for many when I say that I hope that we can make it right > with > Matthew. > > > On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 7:07 PM Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <sa...@racket-lang.org> > wrote: > >> We were saddened to read [Matthew Butterick's recent post]. Matthias >> has written his own [apology] in response. >> >> For our part, some of us were present for the interaction between >> Matthew Butterick and Matthias Felleisen and some of us learned about >> it later. We did not intervene in the way that we should have, and we >> are sorry. >> >> If you wish to offer your thoughts to the people named below, the >> email address feedb...@racket-lang.org will reach us directly. >> >> Jay McCarthy >> John Clements >> Matthew Flatt >> Robby Findler >> Sam Tobin-Hochstadt >> >> [Matthew Butterick's recent post]: >> >> https://beautifulracket.com/appendix/why-i-no-longer-contribute-to-racket.html >> [his own apology]: https://felleisen.org/matthias/Thoughts/Apology.html >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Racket Users" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAK%3DHD%2BZrg1dw%3Ds1HnO17hBU55x%2B%3D9XkEonLxNjwyi-gu1jrfcw%40mail.gmail.com >> . >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/87eecuwdtv.fsf%40privacyrequired.com.
