Re: [racket] FW: Racket documentation for web development is just awful!

2011-12-20 Thread Carson Chittom
Racket Noob writes: > Of course I care! > I love racket and deeply respect all of you. But, I'm afraid that if > you go this way, Racket remain just another never used "academic" > language. If you genuinely believe that, then you have it in your power to fix things: *do* things in Racket rath

Re: [racket] FW: Racket documentation for web development is just awful!

2011-12-19 Thread Gerry Weaver
Hi Richard, >Racket is like cod liver oil in a soda shoppe. This is true until you take a few healthy swigs and start to realize what could have been while watching your entire programming career pass before your eyes.   I'm starting to see so many things that could have been done so much easie

Re: [racket] FW: Racket documentation for web development is just awful!

2011-12-19 Thread Matthias Felleisen
On Dec 19, 2011, at 9:18 PM, Richard Cleis wrote: > Racket is like cod liver oil in a soda shoppe. Loving it _ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users

Re: [racket] FW: Racket documentation for web development is just awful!

2011-12-19 Thread Richard Cleis
On Dec 19, 2011, at 6:03 PM, Gerry Weaver wrote: > Hi Noob, > > I believe I mentioned before that I had some trouble with the web development > docs myself. However, after thinking it over a bit, I decided to invest more > time in learning the language. It occurred to me that in order to reall

Re: [racket] FW: Racket documentation for web development is just awful!

2011-12-19 Thread Gerry Weaver
Hi Noob, I believe I mentioned before that I had some trouble with the web development docs myself. However, after thinking it over a bit, I decided to invest more time in learning the language. It occurred to me that in order to really take advantage of the web server, I would need to become a

Re: [racket] FW: Racket documentation for web development is just awful!

2011-12-19 Thread Racket Noob
nd that goes hand in hand with negligible use of racket in practice. : ( Subject: Re: [racket] FW: Racket documentation for web development is just awful! From: matth...@ccs.neu.edu Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 18:23:38 -0500 CC: users@racket-lang.org To: racketn...@hotmail.com That doesn't

Re: [racket] FW: Racket documentation for web development is just awful!

2011-12-19 Thread Matthias Felleisen
n thank you for your help and kindness! > > Subject: Re: [racket] FW: Racket documentation for web development is just > awful! > From: matth...@ccs.neu.edu > Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 18:10:13 -0500 > CC: users@racket-lang.org > To: racketn...@hotmail.com > > > On De

Re: [racket] FW: Racket documentation for web development is just awful!

2011-12-19 Thread Racket Noob
Yes, You, professor: some time ago I was asked you to rate my solution for "Peg Solitaire" and once again thank you for your help and kindness! Subject: Re: [racket] FW: Racket documentation for web development is just awful! From: matth...@ccs.neu.edu Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 18:10:1

Re: [racket] FW: Racket documentation for web development is just awful!

2011-12-19 Thread Matthias Felleisen
On Dec 19, 2011, at 6:05 PM, Racket Noob wrote: > Mr. Matthis already knows some details about my "psychopathological" profile. Me? _ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users