ok, ok, please, don't be so pedantic. In the correspondence I've told you a
little about yourself. And that's what I meant when I said that you already
know some details about me... But that's irrelevant anyway. What is relevant is
that the mass-production continues... and that goes hand in hand with
negligible use of racket in practice. : (
Subject: Re: [racket] FW: Racket documentation for web development is just
awful!
From: matth...@ccs.neu.edu
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 18:23:38 -0500
CC: users@racket-lang.org
To: racketn...@hotmail.com
That doesn't me I know you. I provided advice on a solution to a book problem,
and that's that.
On Dec 19, 2011, at 6:16 PM, Racket Noob wrote:
Yes, You, professor: some time ago I was asked you to rate my solution for "Peg
Solitaire" and once again thank you for your help and kindness!
Subject: Re: [racket] FW: Racket documentation for web development is just
awful!
From: matth...@ccs.neu.edu
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 18:10:13 -0500
CC: users@racket-lang.org
To: racketn...@hotmail.com
On Dec 19, 2011, at 6:05 PM, Racket Noob wrote:Mr. Matthis already knows some
details about my "psychopathological" profile.
Me?
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
