017 17:30
> To: Jos Koot
> Cc: Racket Users
> Subject: Re: [racket-users] numerical partitions
>
> my use will be a rhythmic pattern generator macro within the Common Music
> package. Sorry I lost the original implementation when my
> computer crashed last year, Iain
&
I have put my code at: https://github.com/joskoot/partitions
Best wishes, Jos
-Original Message-
From: Iain Gray [mailto:iaing...@ednet.co.uk]
Sent: jueves, 09 de noviembre de 2017 17:30
To: Jos Koot
Cc: Racket Users
Subject: Re: [racket-users] numerical partitions
my use will be a
al Message-
> From: racket-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:racket-users@googlegroups.com] On
> Behalf Of Iain Gray
> Sent: jueves, 09 de noviembre de 2017 11:17
> To: Racket Users
> Subject: [racket-users] numerical partitions
>
> Many years ago (r5rs days) I asked for help in
scribble.
Jos
-Original Message-
From: racket-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:racket-users@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Iain Gray
Sent: jueves, 09 de noviembre de 2017 11:17
To: Racket Users
Subject: [racket-users] numerical partitions
Many years ago (r5rs days) I asked for help in
Many years ago (r5rs days) I asked for help in partitioning numbers i.e.
(part 4) returns ((4) (3 1) (2 2) (2 1 1) (1 1 1 1))
where the order of solutions is not important. Is it more efficient to
implement using Racket’s iteration macros? Any help would be appreciated.
Iain
--
You received
5 matches
Mail list logo
