Many years ago (r5rs days) I asked for help in partitioning numbers i.e. (part 4) returns ((4) (3 1) (2 2) (2 1 1) (1 1 1 1))
where the order of solutions is not important. Is it more efficient to implement using Racket’s iteration macros? Any help would be appreciated. Iain -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
