I like Matthew's blog post for that purpose.
http://blog.racket-lang.org/2011/10/on-eval-in-dynamic-languages-generally.html
Vincent
On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 15:55:56 -0500,
Neil Van Dyke wrote:
>
> On second thought, it's arrogant of me to do a drive-by "don't use eval"
> PSA, if I'm not willing
On second thought, it's arrogant of me to do a drive-by "don't use eval"
PSA, if I'm not willing to support the assertion each time it's questioned.
Or I should have a written argument somewhere that supports my assertion
well enough, that I can point people to it and expect not to have to say
Note that the web-server has support for serializable closures:
http://docs.racket-lang.org/web-server-internal/closure.html
I think they are the practical choice.
/Jens Axel
2015-08-03 12:29 GMT+02:00 Jens Axel Søgaard :
> 2015-08-02 19:12 GMT+02:00 Konstantin Weitz :
>
>> I'm trying to
2015-08-02 19:12 GMT+02:00 Konstantin Weitz :
> I'm trying to write a distributed racket program using [places][0]. From
> my current understanding, this means that I have to send data to each place
> over a channel using the `place-channel-put` function, which can send any
> value accepted by `pl
On 03/08/2015 07:22, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
Michael Titke wrote on 08/03/2015 12:50 AM:
Perhaps /quote/ and /eval/ would do the job? That is the usual way to
treat Scheme code as data and data as Scheme code.
Eval might indeed be the perfect solution this time, iff every other
conceivable alt
Michael Titke wrote on 08/03/2015 12:50 AM:
Perhaps /quote/ and /eval/ would do the job? That is the usual way to
treat Scheme code as data and data as Scheme code.
Eval might indeed be the perfect solution this time, iff every other
conceivable alternative has been rejected. :)
Shameless
On 02/08/2015 19:12, Konstantin Weitz wrote:
I'm trying to write a distributed racket program using [places][0]. From my
current understanding, this means that I have to send data to each place over a
channel using the `place-channel-put` function, which can send any value
accepted by `place-m
I'm trying to write a distributed racket program using [places][0]. From my
current understanding, this means that I have to send data to each place over a
channel using the `place-channel-put` function, which can send any value
accepted by `place-message-allowed?`.
I would like to send closure
8 matches
Mail list logo
