I like Matthew's blog post for that purpose. http://blog.racket-lang.org/2011/10/on-eval-in-dynamic-languages-generally.html
Vincent On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 15:55:56 -0500, Neil Van Dyke wrote: > > On second thought, it's arrogant of me to do a drive-by "don't use eval" > PSA, if I'm not willing to support the assertion each time it's > questioned. > > Or I should have a written argument somewhere that supports my assertion > well enough, that I can point people to it and expect not to have to say > much more. > > (I actually did try to Google the other day, to see whether any past > list discussion of eval was good to point people to, but lost > time/interest when there was a problem with Google's indexing of the > list archive. I posted about the indexing problem to racket-dev.) > > Neil V. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
