Re: [racket] my 2 cents on Web application tutorial being too advanced

2014-05-05 Thread J G Cho
There are reasons why one might want to write web apps in Racket but blogging may not be the best use case. I wish TOPSL is maintained up to date with Racket and featured more prominently. On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 7:44 AM, Ben wrote: > I agree with you on the URL part. When I saw URL like: > >

Re: [racket] my 2 cents on Web application tutorial being too advanced

2014-05-05 Thread Ben
I agree with you on the URL part. When I saw URL like: http://localhost:50937/servlets/standalone.rkt;((%22k%22%20.%20%22(1%201%205404687)%22)) I thought I probably won't write web application like this. Because I think URL is part of the content, and it should be meaningful. On Sun, May 4, 20

[racket] my 2 cents on Web application tutorial being too advanced

2014-05-04 Thread J G Cho
I think the first tutorial (blog) might be better off using http://docs.racket-lang.org/web-server/dispatch.html, which resembles more of the conventional way of doing web app, ie dealing with request and response. In particular, the resulting k-url is not permanent (at least when I was working th