There are reasons why one might want to write web apps in Racket but blogging may not be the best use case. I wish TOPSL is maintained up to date with Racket and featured more prominently.
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 7:44 AM, Ben <yfe...@gmail.com> wrote: > I agree with you on the URL part. When I saw URL like: > > > http://localhost:50937/servlets/standalone.rkt;((%22k%22%20.%20%22(1%201%205404687)%22)) > > I thought I probably won't write web application like this. Because I > think URL is part of the content, and it should be meaningful. > > > On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 11:12 PM, J G Cho <g...@fundingmatters.com> wrote: > >> I think the first tutorial (blog) might be better off using >> http://docs.racket-lang.org/web-server/dispatch.html, which resembles >> more of the conventional way of doing web app, ie dealing with request and >> response. >> >> In particular, the resulting k-url is not permanent (at least when I was >> working thru the tutorial a couple of years ago), and it's a bit of a head >> scratcher that you cannot link to a blog post. >> >> The continuation based approach may make more sense (better motivation) >> in an e-commerce/shopping cart example. >> >> >> >> >> >> ____________________ >> Racket Users list: >> http://lists.racket-lang.org/users >> >> >
____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
