On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Grant Rettke wrote:
>
> That is like eval but for talking to objects?
>
More like looking up an interned symbol from a namespace.
(A very limited form of eval...)
Best,
Nicolas.
_
For list-related administrative
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Shriram Krishnamurthi
wrote:
> Right. In other words, Racket would become a true scripting language. <-;
Then it must get added :).
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinf
Right. In other words, Racket would become a true scripting language. <-;
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Grant Rettke wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
>> At Sun, 13 Nov 2011 21:00:55 +, "nicolas.o...@gmail.com" wrote:
>>> Is there a function to send to a clas
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Sun, 13 Nov 2011 21:00:55 +, "nicolas.o...@gmail.com" wrote:
>> Is there a function to send to a class with a dynamic symbol instead of a
>> static one?
>>
>> As in (send 'method-name)
>
> I'll look into this more, but you can wri
At Sun, 13 Nov 2011 21:00:55 +, "nicolas.o...@gmail.com" wrote:
> Is there a function to send to a class with a dynamic symbol instead of a
> static one?
>
> As in (send 'method-name)
I'll look into this more, but you can write
(send-generic o (make-generic (object-interface o) 'method
Dear all,
Is there a function to send to a class with a dynamic symbol instead of a
static one?
As in (send 'method-name)
send seems to reduce to find-method/who, but this function is not exported.
Best regards,
Nicolas.
_
For list-related
6 matches
Mail list logo
