Right. In other words, Racket would become a true scripting language. <-;
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Grant Rettke <gret...@acm.org> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Matthew Flatt <mfl...@cs.utah.edu> wrote: >> At Sun, 13 Nov 2011 21:00:55 +0000, "nicolas.o...@gmail.com" wrote: >>> Is there a function to send to a class with a dynamic symbol instead of a >>> static one? >>> >>> As in (send .... 'method-name) >> >> I'll look into this more, but you can write >> >> (send-generic o (make-generic (object-interface o) 'method-name) arg ...) >> >> which suggests that there really should be a variant of `send' that >> works with symbolic method names. > > That is like eval but for talking to objects? > > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users > _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
