At Thu, 1 Sep 2011 20:14:09 -0700, John Clements wrote:
>
> On Sep 1, 2011, at 8:03 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>
> > Two hours ago, Robby Findler wrote:
> >> Does it make sense to have the resource managed by a custodian? That
> >> is, operate the ffi/C level where you can extend what happens when a
On Sep 1, 2011, at 8:03 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> Two hours ago, Robby Findler wrote:
>> Does it make sense to have the resource managed by a custodian? That
>> is, operate the ffi/C level where you can extend what happens when a
>> custodian is shutdown to close whatever needs closing or finaliz
Two hours ago, Robby Findler wrote:
> Does it make sense to have the resource managed by a custodian? That
> is, operate the ffi/C level where you can extend what happens when a
> custodian is shutdown to close whatever needs closing or finalizing
> or whatever before it gets gc'd but when the cust
Does it make sense to have the resource managed by a custodian? That
is, operate the ffi/C level where you can extend what happens when a
custodian is shutdown to close whatever needs closing or finalizing or
whatever before it gets gc'd but when the custodian is shutdown?
Robby
On Thu, Sep 1, 20
I'd love to find a way to call a sound library's "terminate" function when
Racket shuts down. My recollection of the lay of the land here is that it's
very hard to make this happen correctly without mangling Racket itself. At a
high level, I believe the explanation is that it violates the bound
5 matches
Mail list logo
