At Thu, 1 Sep 2011 20:14:09 -0700, John Clements wrote: > > On Sep 1, 2011, at 8:03 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote: > > > Two hours ago, Robby Findler wrote: > >> Does it make sense to have the resource managed by a custodian? That > >> is, operate the ffi/C level where you can extend what happens when a > >> custodian is shutdown to close whatever needs closing or finalizing > >> or whatever before it gets gc'd but when the custodian is shutdown? > > > > The problem is that you can always just exit the process. Maybe > > atexit() is more fitting? > > Ooh, I like it. That sounds promising. > > Thanks for the pointer.
There's also scheme_add_atexit_closer(), which is connected to custodians and works for places. _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
