its in git and will appear in the official manual when the docs are useable
(slowly but surely)
On 05/21/2013 02:50 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> Anyone know where Honu disappeared to? I don't see it in the current manual,
> nor in PLaneT.
> http://download.racket-lang.org/docs/5.1.3/html/honu/
>
On 05/21/2013 02:45 PM, David Bremner wrote:
> Tom Schouten writes:
>
>> Interesting, but I'm tied to Racket at this point.
>>
> I'd have a look at "Honu" by Jon Rafkind if you haven't seen it
> already. It adds an algol like syntax on top of racket,
>
> It looks a bit javascriptish, I guess
>
>
Anyone know where Honu disappeared to? I don't see it in the current
manual, nor in PLaneT.
http://download.racket-lang.org/docs/5.1.3/html/honu/
BTW, the usual pattern is that someone will think Racket/Scheme/Lisp
needs a C-like syntax, but after they actually start using parens for
idiomati
Tom Schouten writes:
> Interesting, but I'm tied to Racket at this point.
>
I'd have a look at "Honu" by Jon Rafkind if you haven't seen it
already. It adds an algol like syntax on top of racket,
It looks a bit javascriptish, I guess
function quadratic(a, b, c) {
var discriminant = sqr(b
Interesting, but I'm tied to Racket at this point.
On 05/21/2013 03:35 PM, Marc Feeley wrote:
If you are willing to switch Scheme implementations, you could use Gambit that
has an infix syntax (SIX) which is a subset/superset of C.
Marc
On May 21, 2013, at 12:26 PM, Tom Schouten wrote:
Hi
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 03:26:26PM -0400, Tom Schouten wrote:
>
> Is there anything re-usable out there in Racket land that looks like
> C but with a simpler grammar or a simple map to s-expressions? The
> language I'm implementing is purely functional / single assignment,
> and looks pretty much
There are actually a couple of C language modes and a JavaScript one in
Planet.
On May 21, 2013 3:28 PM, "Tom Schouten" wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> Checking if anyone has any ideas or advice on this.
>
> I'm writing a DSL for (music) DSP low-level algorithm design, and I'd like
> to use some C-like syn
Hi List,
Checking if anyone has any ideas or advice on this.
I'm writing a DSL for (music) DSP low-level algorithm design, and I'd
like to use some C-like syntax front on top of the default s-expr input
to avoid having to confront people with Scheme.
I realize this approach has been tried ma
8 matches
Mail list logo
