Interesting, but I'm tied to Racket at this point.
On 05/21/2013 03:35 PM, Marc Feeley wrote:
If you are willing to switch Scheme implementations, you could use Gambit that
has an infix syntax (SIX) which is a subset/superset of C.
Marc
On May 21, 2013, at 12:26 PM, Tom Schouten<t...@zwizwa.be> wrote:
Hi List,
Checking if anyone has any ideas or advice on this.
I'm writing a DSL for (music) DSP low-level algorithm design, and I'd like to
use some C-like syntax front on top of the default s-expr input to avoid having
to confront people with Scheme.
I realize this approach has been tried many times and was abandoned maybe just
as much, but I am confronted with a practical issue in the target audience.
It's amazing how much friction a foreign syntax can cause in practical
embedded/DSP engineering circles...
Is there anything re-usable out there in Racket land that looks like C but with
a simpler grammar or a simple map to s-expressions? The language I'm
implementing is purely functional / single assignment, and looks pretty much
like Scheme at this point.
A subset of JavaScript would maybe also be good enough.
Cheers,
Tom
____________________
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
____________________
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
