From: Greg Hendershott
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 10:01 AM
To: m0nas...@tengulabs.com
Cc: users@racket-lang.org
Subject: Re: [racket] Question about string conversion
To add to what Carl and Robby said:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 2:29 AM, wrote:
> (although truth
I recently came across a site that made coming up with regular expressions
much, much easier for me: http://www.debuggex.com/
Hopefully that will help with your "regex hell" problem.
On Thursday, July 18, 2013, Greg Hendershott wrote:
> To add to what Carl and Robby said:
>
> On Thu, Jul 18, 201
To add to what Carl and Robby said:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 2:29 AM, wrote:
> (although truth be told, mail headers are surprisingly nonstandard even
> within a single message)
That's where net/head could definitely help. (Especially for SMTP
headers, which tend to be more "interesting" than ty
Also, check out the net/head library:
http://docs.racket-lang.org/net/head.html?q=header%20parse&q=header
Robby
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Carl Eastlund wrote:
> Chris,
>
> The regexp-match* function has a rather complex input/output
> specification, because it is doing a lot of things
Chris,
The regexp-match* function has a rather complex input/output specification,
because it is doing a lot of things at once. If you only want the first
match of a regular expression, you might want to consider regexp-match
instead (no *); its specification is slightly simpler, though still a
l
Hi, I'm super new to Racket, but had what I hope isn't too
embarrassingly easy of a question.
I'm writing a program that parses SMTP headers in order to automate some
business-y workflow. I managed to put together a series of
"regexp-match*"s to parse out the specific identifiers I was looking for
6 matches
Mail list logo
