Re: [racket] DrRacket 5.3 [3m] hangs for a while when closing tab with open file

2012-08-16 Thread Erik Dominikus
> One way to run with the environment variable set is via the command-line: > > env PLTDRPROFILE=1 drracket > > Thanks, > Robby > > On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Erik Dominikus > wrote: > > On my machine, DrRacket 5.3 [3m] (built from source package) looks

Re: [racket] DrRacket 5.3 [3m] hangs for a while when closing tab with open file

2012-08-16 Thread Erik Dominikus
Deleting the ~/.racket directory solves the problem. Restoring that directory brings the problem back. Maybe Racket 5.3 somehow gets disgusted by Racket 5.2 leftovers? On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 10:52 +0700, Erik Dominikus wrote: > On my machine, DrRacket 5.3 [3m] (built from source package) lo

Re: [racket] [bug?] Racklog cut differs from Prolog cut

2012-08-15 Thread Erik Dominikus
an Culpepper wrote: > On 08/13/2012 04:41 PM, Marco Alberti wrote: > > Erik, > > > > On Sun, 12 Aug 2012 12:32:53 +0700, Erik Dominikus wrote: > > > > > >> (define %a > >>(%rel (x) > >> ((x) (%b x) !) > >>

[racket] DrRacket 5.3 [3m] hangs for a while when closing tab with open file

2012-08-15 Thread Erik Dominikus
On my machine, DrRacket 5.3 [3m] (built from source package) looks like waiting for something for about 5-10 seconds when closing a tab that has a file open in it. It did not happen on Racket 5.2 [3m]. My machine's uname -a: Linux kire 2.6.32-41-generic #91-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jun 13 11:43:55 UTC 201

[racket] [bug?] Racklog cut differs from Prolog cut

2012-08-11 Thread Erik Dominikus
Racket version: 5.2. Output of 'uname -a': Linux kire 2.6.32-41-generic #91-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jun 13 11:43:55 UTC 2012 x86_64 GNU/Linux Symptom: In SWI Prolog (or any Prolog interpreter I think), querying a(X) gives X=1 and X=2. Racklog only gives x=1. How to reproduce: Download 'a.pl' (attache

Re: [racket] on the arity of the composition of procedures with different arities

2012-08-10 Thread Erik Dominikus
. On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 22:56 -0500, Robby Findler wrote: > Looks like a bug in compose1 (and compose) to me. > > Robby > > On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 10:46 PM, Erik Dominikus > wrote: > > I had this conversation with DrRacket 5.2: > > > >> (procedure-arity (c

[racket] on the arity of the composition of procedures with different arities

2012-08-07 Thread Erik Dominikus
I had this conversation with DrRacket 5.2: > (procedure-arity (compose1 (lambda (x) 0) (lambda () 0))) (arity-at-least 0) > (procedure-arity (compose1 (lambda (x) 0) (lambda (x) 0))) 1 > (procedure-arity (compose1 (lambda (x) x) (lambda (x y) 0))) (arity-at-least 0) I think the arity of the fir

Re: [racket] Neils

2012-02-12 Thread Erik Dominikus
ROFLMAO... I didn't notice it until just now... Now that you mention it, Racket seems to have some sort of affinity for Neils and Matthews. Hearing all that Battle for Racketdom made me vividly imagine the Neils and Matthews riding 'macro transformers' (some sort of giant robot), throwing parenthe

Re: [racket] I think I found a bug in the JITC

2012-01-30 Thread Erik Dominikus
Only 3 hours from report to fix. That's quite impressive. :-D @Marijn: I forgot... my platform is Ubuntu 10.04 Linux 2.6.32-38 x86_64. Still learning to write bug reports I guess. :-| Once again, thanks! ~ sorry if the response seems to be coming at a weird time; I'm on the other side of the wo

[racket] I think I found a bug in the JITC

2012-01-30 Thread Erik Dominikus
Source code for reproducing attached. 'racket --version' shows 5.2. I built from source. The expected result is a list, but Racket gave this error message instead: internal error: flonum position not found === context === /kage/racket-5.2/collects/racket/private/stream-cons.rkt:42:0: stream-fo

Re: [racket] Module runs fine, but won't scribble

2012-01-12 Thread Erik Dominikus
sage. But that means this conflict will happen again if somebody defines a name the racket module such that that name is also defined in my module, doesn't it? Thanks for the hint. On Thu, 2012-01-12 at 11:57 -0700, Matthew Flatt wrote: > At Thu, 12 Jan 2012 23:56:18 +0700, Erik Dominikus

Re: [racket] Module runs fine, but won't scribble

2012-01-12 Thread Erik Dominikus
> Have you tried > > #lang scribble/manual > @(require (except-in (for-label racket/base) time)) > > Sorry for your lost sleep. -- Matthias > > > > On Jan 11, 2012, at 4:47 PM, Erik Dominikus wrote: > > > I need to define 'time', but it is alre

[racket] Module runs fine, but won't scribble

2012-01-11 Thread Erik Dominikus
I need to define 'time', but it is already defined in scheme/base. My module runs just fine. The problem is when I want to generate documentation, scribble refuses to cooperate (in label phase level), with 'module: identifier already imported for label' as the reason (details at the end of this tex