As I'm sure you've noticed, we updated the RacketCon site today:
https://con.racket-lang.org/
Visit today to find out...
1) What the title of the keynote is!
2) Where we will be doing a social event on Saturday evening!
3) What is happening on Sunday!
We hope that you will tell all your frien
You may be interesting in the `web-server/test` library:
https://docs.racket-lang.org/web-server/test.html
--
Jay McCarthy
Associate Professor @ CS @ UMass Lowell
http://jeapostrophe.github.io
Vincit qui se vincit.
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 2:24 PM Comrade SparklePony
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'
Hello,
I'm new to Racket, and to gain facility with it I have been trying to
write small webapps, i.e. a simple calculator, using the built-in web
framework. However, I have found myself stuck when trying to implement
tests for some of the functions the webapp provides-- I am not sure how t
At Thu, 30 May 2019 08:06:33 -0500, Robby Findler wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 8:03 AM Laurent wrote:
> > I suspect that if Matthew feels a need to ask about this, this means the
> price of backward compatibility to pay for all of us may be quite significant.
>
> Not one to put words in Matt
I just tried this on my build (from HEAD) and I also do not see any
slowdown. Trying with a regular installer would be helpful.
Sam
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 5:09 PM evdubs wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I have noticed sluggish performance with my plot overlays in Racket 7.3 that
> I had not noticed in v
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 9:03 AM Laurent wrote:
If no one is really relying on them as of today, then I would strongly support
allowing Matthew to break things and move fast. If anyone has a real need for
such a data structure it can still probably be implemented later as a
third-party library
At Thu, 30 May 2019 12:10:37 +0200, Konrad Hinsen wrote:
> Am 29.05.19 um 17:52 schrieb Matthew Flatt:
>
> > Does anyone use single-flonums in Racket?
>
> Right now, no, but I have used them briefly in a past project, for
> testing the impact of single-precision on a numerical algorithm.
Thanks
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 8:03 AM Laurent wrote:
> I suspect that if Matthew feels a need to ask about this, this means the
> price of backward compatibility to pay for all of us may be quite significant.
Not one to put words in Matthew's mouth, but I presume that he is
hopeful that no one is actu
If no one is really relying on them as of today, then I would strongly
support allowing Matthew to break things and move fast. If anyone has a
real need for such a data structure it can still probably be implemented
later as a third-party library, possibly extended to
user-specified-precision flonu
Hello,
Racket is a perfect tool for creating new languages and compilers
for them, everybody knows that.
There is one thing, though, generally available in compilers and
not instantly available in Racket DSL tools (or I just missed it).
How to specify options to the compiler?
Consider a source
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 12:10:37PM +0200, Konrad Hinsen wrote:
> Am 29.05.19 um 17:52 schrieb Matthew Flatt:
>
> > Does anyone use single-flonums in Racket?
>
> Right now, no, but I have used them briefly in a past project, for testing
> the impact of single-precision on a numerical algorithm.
>
Am 29.05.19 um 17:52 schrieb Matthew Flatt:
Does anyone use single-flonums in Racket?
Right now, no, but I have used them briefly in a past project, for
testing the impact of single-precision on a numerical algorithm.
The main reason to use single-precision floats nowadays is cutting
memor
12 matches
Mail list logo
