At Thu, 30 May 2019 12:10:37 +0200, Konrad Hinsen wrote: > Am 29.05.19 um 17:52 schrieb Matthew Flatt: > > > Does anyone use single-flonums in Racket? > > Right now, no, but I have used them briefly in a past project, for > testing the impact of single-precision on a numerical algorithm.
Thanks for replying! Would using `math/bigfloat` (where you get to pick the precision) have worked in that case? In a small example, I imagine you could import `math/bigfloat` and strip the `bf` prefix using `filtered-in` to replace the usual arithmetic operations with bigfloat variants. But I expect that would become painful in a larger example, especially if multiple modules are involved. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/5cefd822.1c69fb81.14c1b.3b52SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING%40gmr-mx.google.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
