Re: [racket-users] Strange behaviour of the eq? operator in racket repl

2015-05-17 Thread Alexis King
Yes, Scheme (and therefore Racket) has eq?, eqv?, and equal?. I understand the desire for eq? and equal?, but I’ve always been skeptical of the necessity of eqv?. Either way, Scheme left this behavior unspecified, but I believe Racket specifies it (though I could be wrong). Racket has two kinds

Re: [racket-users] Strange behaviour of the eq? operator in racket repl

2015-05-17 Thread Michael Tiedtke
I'm new to Racket but even R5RS is rather clear about this issue: (citation from doc/r5rs/r5rs-std/r5rs-Z-H-9.html) > (eq? 2 2) ===> unspecified > > Rationale: It will usually be possible to implement eq? much more > efficiently than eqv?, for example, as a simple pointer comparison instead

[racket-users] [CFP] SECOND NOTICE: Scheme and Functional Programming Workshop 2015

2015-05-17 Thread Andy Keep
SECOND NOTICE: DEADLINE THIS FRIDAY! Call For Papers: Scheme and Functional Programming Workshop 2015 Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (Co-located with ICFP 2015) http://andykeep.com/SchemeWorkshop2015/

Re: [racket-users] Strange behaviour of the eq? operator in racket repl

2015-05-17 Thread George Neuner
Hi, On 5/17/2015 5:32 PM, Atticus wrote: --- $ racket Welcome to Racket v6.1.1. > (eq? 'l 'l) #f > (eq? 'l 'l) #t > $ racket --no-jit Welcome to Racket v6.1.1. > (eq? 'l 'l) #f > (eq? 'l 'l) #t > (eq? 'l 'l) #f > (eq? 'l 'l) #t > (eq? 'l 'l) #t > (eq? 'l 'l) #t > (eq? 'l

Re: [racket-users] pkg-build report for the v6.2 release candidate

2015-05-17 Thread Matthew Flatt
>From the error at http://pkg-build.racket-lang.org/server/built/test-fail/pollen.txt is looks like the test depends on `racket` being in $PATH, but $PATH in the (intentionally minimal) pkg-build test environment doesn't include `racket`. You could use `find-exe` from `compiler/find-exe` to ma

[racket-users] Fwd: Us congress hearing of maan alsaan Money laundry قضية الكونغجرس لغسيل الأموال للمليادير معن الصانع

2015-05-17 Thread lomo hany
YouTube videos of U.S. Congress money laundering hearing of Saudi Billionaire " Maan Al sanea" with *bank of America* and The owner of Saad Hospital and Schools in the Eastern Province in *Saudi Arabia* and the Chairman of the Board of Directors of Awal Bank in *Bahrain* Wit

[racket-users] Strange behaviour of the eq? operator in racket repl

2015-05-17 Thread Atticus
Hello everyone, So i am trying to learn scheme in my free time (unfortunately my university doesn't use scheme in their undergraduate courses) and i was comparing the equality operators in gambit and racket and encountered a strange behaviour with the eq? operator in racket. To my surprise compari

[racket-users] racket testing on openwrt

2015-05-17 Thread Neil Van Dyke
Can someone recommend an easy way to test Racket 9.2 pre-release on OpenWrt (embedded GNU/Linux, running on a normal home WiFi router)? For example, is there a big tree of files that I could just copy onto a USB flash drive, and run with one command, and it would dump its log to a file or stdi

Re: [racket-users] pkg-build report for the v6.2 release candidate

2015-05-17 Thread Robby Findler
Rack test defines any stderr output to be a bug. Robby On Sunday, May 17, 2015, Matthew Butterick wrote: > FWIW I've had the same problem. Even though 'raco test -p pollen' shows no > errors locally nor on Travis CI, the Racket build system produces a > "non-empty stderr" test failure [1]. In m

Re: [racket-users] pkg-build report for the v6.2 release candidate

2015-05-17 Thread Matthew Butterick
FWIW I've had the same problem. Even though 'raco test -p pollen' shows no errors locally nor on Travis CI, the Racket build system produces a "non-empty stderr" test failure [1]. In my case, however, my test file [2] does not use check-exn (though it does use `system`) [1] http://release-pkg-bui

Re: [racket-users] pkg-build report for the v6.2 release candidate

2015-05-17 Thread Matthew Flatt
At Fri, 15 May 2015 13:17:57 -0700, John Clements wrote: > > > On May 14, 2015, at 4:08 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote: > > > > Here are the results of a package build using the v6.2 release > > candidate: > > > > http://release-pkg-build.racket-lang.org.s3-website-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/ > > > > Co