Oh, I see it now. Thanks for the detailed explanation; I had
misinterpreted earlier.
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 21:14:48 -0600, Neil Toronto wrote:
> On 08/24/2012 06:23 PM, Michael Wilber wrote:
> > This is interesting, but I don't understand how moving cons around keeps
> > it from allocating? In part
On 08/24/2012 06:23 PM, Michael Wilber wrote:
This is interesting, but I don't understand how moving cons around keeps
it from allocating? In particular, why are the cons calls "evaluated at
expansion time" when we may not even know the length of the list during
macro expansion time?
If I write
When you use
#lang web-server
You have to use
web-server/lang/web ---
http://docs.racket-lang.org/web-server/stateless.html#(part._lang/web)
rather than
web-server/servlet/web (which you are getting from web-server/servlet)
The problem is that your send/suspend/dispatch is the STATEFUL one,
n
This is interesting, but I don't understand how moving cons around keeps
it from allocating? In particular, why are the cons calls "evaluated at
expansion time" when we may not even know the length of the list during
macro expansion time?
Near the top of the post, it says the code "would be slow b
I've edited the post, so there's no problem anymore. I also changed
`drop' and `take' to `split-at', as Ian suggested.
On 08/24/2012 03:56 PM, Adolfo Pérez Álvarez wrote:
Appending "?m=1" to the URL does the trick also:
http://blog.racket-lang.org/2012/08/fully-inlined-merge-sort.html?m=1
201
Appending "?m=1" to the URL does the trick also:
http://blog.racket-lang.org/2012/08/fully-inlined-merge-sort.html?m=1
2012/8/24 Matthias Felleisen :
>
> The code is fully visible in Safari's rss feed reader.
>
>
> On Aug 24, 2012, at 5:34 PM, Neil Toronto wrote:
>
>> On 08/24/2012 03:22 PM, J. I
Nice! It would be great to link from the post to a full version of
the code somewhere; I like GitHub gists for this purpose but you can
maybe even attach files to posts.
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Neil Toronto wrote:
> I've posted to the Racket blog:
>
> http://blog.racket-lang.org/2012/
The code is fully visible in Safari's rss feed reader.
On Aug 24, 2012, at 5:34 PM, Neil Toronto wrote:
> On 08/24/2012 03:22 PM, J. Ian Johnson wrote:
>> Very cool.
>
> :D
>
> > Is anyone else annoyed at the code being cut off in blog posts, even
>> though (thankfully) highlighting and copy
On 08/24/2012 03:22 PM, J. Ian Johnson wrote:
Very cool.
:D
> Is anyone else annoyed at the code being cut off in blog posts, even
though (thankfully) highlighting and copying gives you the valid code?
I am. I'm especially annoyed that it happened in a place that readers
are most likely to
Very cool. Is anyone else annoyed at the code being cut off in blog posts, even
though (thankfully) highlighting and copying gives you the valid code?
Also, I suggest split-at versus a take followed by a drop for a teensy
performance improvement.
-Ian
- Original Message -
From: "Neil Toro
I've posted to the Racket blog:
http://blog.racket-lang.org/2012/08/fully-inlined-merge-sort.html
It shows how to use continuation-passing style in expansion-phase
functions to fully inline a merge sort. The expanded code doesn't create
any intermediate lists. Or a result list, for that matt
In the run-up to version 5.3, we introduced some new problems in the
handling of numeric types in Typed Racket, which leads to this not
type checking. These problems have since been corrected, but this is
a bug in the released version. If you use a pre-release build [1],
the code will work correc
I'm using Racket 5.3 that I downloaded via the usual route. I tried
experimenting with Typed Racket starting with the first example
program in the Quick Start section of the Typed Racket Guide, and I
got a type error right away. I then made sure I had exactly the same
code in the file as in the Gui
Okay, I have added Geiser. Could others please contribute more specific details
as appropriate? The information I supplied (except for DrRacket) are
placeholder.
On Aug 24, 2012, at 12:14 PM, ozzloy-racket-users wrote:
> maybe you're thinking of geiser?
>
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:45 AM
Geiser is it. Thanks.
On Aug 24, 2012, at 12:14 PM, ozzloy-racket-users wrote:
> maybe you're thinking of geiser?
>
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Matthias Felleisen
> wrote:
>
> I have added a placeholder for DrRacket, Emacs Quack, and WeScheme:
>
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki
maybe you're thinking of geiser?
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Matthias Felleisen
wrote:
>
> I have added a placeholder for DrRacket, Emacs Quack, and WeScheme:
>
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_integrated_development_environments#Racket
>
> Would the concerned party please fil
I have added a placeholder for DrRacket, Emacs Quack, and WeScheme:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_integrated_development_environments#Racket
Would the concerned party please fill in details? Also I am sure that I have
overlooked another Emacs-y thing that has been announced her
Hello friends,
the problem that I describe still occurs. I thing/assume this is a problem with
racket, because in racket 5.3 the given codesequence with misterx gives the
same error and in racket 5.2.1 with MisterX there is no problem with this
Codesequence:
Racket 5.2.1/Misterx:->OK
(require
There's a Wiki page entitled
"Comparison_of_integrated_development_environments", indexed by language.
There are no entries at all for Scheme or Racket. Since DrRacket is in fact
quite a widely-used programming environment, somebody really should add this --
ideally somebody directly involved
Let me spell out Richard's comment in some detail. The docs for on-paint in
get-dc say that the function is called on no arguments (other than this) and
produce no values. So this demands
(define/override (on-paint) ...)
because other methods in the superclass call this method like this (on-
Is there any way to make a app with system-tray in racket ?
I try to use win32api via ffi/unsafe , but i can not find or overwrite the
WindowProc callback function of a top-level-windows 。
How can I do this?
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
21 matches
Mail list logo
