Very cool. Is anyone else annoyed at the code being cut off in blog posts, even though (thankfully) highlighting and copying gives you the valid code? Also, I suggest split-at versus a take followed by a drop for a teensy performance improvement. -Ian ----- Original Message ----- From: "Neil Toronto" <neil.toro...@gmail.com> To: users@racket-lang.org Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 5:08:37 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: [racket] Racket blog post: Fully Inlined Merge Sort
I've posted to the Racket blog: http://blog.racket-lang.org/2012/08/fully-inlined-merge-sort.html It shows how to use continuation-passing style in expansion-phase functions to fully inline a merge sort. The expanded code doesn't create any intermediate lists. Or a result list, for that matter. Neil ⊥ ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
