Very nifty tool! Thanks, Ryan.
[]'s
Rodolfo Carvalho
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 20:01, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
> I've just released Scriblogify, a tool that lets you write blog
> posts in Scribble and automatically upload them to Blogger-hosted
> blogs (such as The Racket Blog).
>
> More details in
On 04/04/2012 02:02 PM, Ray Racine wrote:
One more anecdote I also seem to recall Typed Racket uncovering a bug in
SRFI-19 string formatting code. I just can't say enough about the value
of Typed Racket.If it had a finger I'd put a ring on it.[1]
Ray
[1] No honeymoon jokes, or commentary o
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 12:39 PM, John Clements wrote:
>
> A quick scan of your repository suggests that you were also focused on
> julian<->date conversions and on formatting. Is this a fair summary?
>
> John
>
>
Yep.
The primary goal was to position everything where I had a top level suite
prede
I had to instantiate the "map" function explicitly, and couldn't use
"cons?" because it returns whether something is a Pair, not a Listof - but
the following works:
(: cars : (All (A) (Listof (Listof A)) -> (Listof A)))
(define (cars ls)
((inst map A (Listof A)) car (filter (λ (x) (not (empty? x)
Hi,
Is there a way to get this to typecheck?
(: cars : (All (A) (Listof (Listof A)) -> (Listof A)))
(define (cars ls)
(map car (filter cons? ls)))
By looking at the error, it seems the problem is that it is impossible to map
car on a list of lists:
> (map car '((1)))
Type Checker: Polymorphic
On Apr 4, 2012, at 12:54 PM, Nadeem Abdul Hamid wrote:
> Based on a quick poll at the beginning of my talk, there were lots
> of people who taught intro CS but no one had heard of Racket or
> Program-by-Design. There were other presentations, and people talked
> about and were familiar with thing
That sounds like an extremely frustrating situation.
My idea about a "product marketing" role is something I've been
thinking about for a long time, going back even before RacketCon
itself. I wasn't sure if the idea would be welcomed, so I've hesitated
about how and when to bring it up. I regret t
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Greg Hendershott
wrote:
> Sometimes I've wondered if it would help to have someone designated in
> a "product marketing" role. Even if it would be only a part-time or
> school-seasonal position.
I was thinking exactly this too this past weekend, in the context of
On Apr 4, 2012, at 9:28 AM, Ray Racine wrote:
> Stay in the scheme sphere long enough everyone has their SRFI moment and one
> concerning SRFI-19 in particular. Here I refer to the, "that's it, I can't
> stand no more, by god, this time I'm going replace SRFI-19" moment.
>
> A couple of mont
Stay in the scheme sphere long enough everyone has their SRFI moment and
one concerning SRFI-19 in particular. Here I refer to the, "that's it, I
can't stand no more, by god, this time I'm going replace SRFI-19" moment.
A couple of months back I had my nth moment with SRFI-19 and my usual
partia
On Apr 4, 2012, at 8:17 AM, Neil Toronto wrote:
> On 03/27/2012 01:46 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
>> Rodolfo Carvalho wrote at 03/27/2012 03:27 PM:
>>> Actually, I wonder if people use any srfi much?
>>
>> Some people still use SRFIs with Racket (I don't anymore), but usually
>> Racket has somewhat
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Greg Hendershott
wrote:
> I do think there are some missed opportunities such as the RacketCon videos.
The RacketCon videos have not been released because the student
volunteer, Jeff Dlouhy, who did the videotaping has failed to edit
them, release them, or make th
Racket is an amazing thing and sometimes I feel badly that not enough
people know about and appreciate it.
The team and community does a very, very good job of promoting it in
numerous ways. I am in no way being critical of that -- not one bit.
I do think there are some missed opportunities such
On 03/27/2012 01:46 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
Rodolfo Carvalho wrote at 03/27/2012 03:27 PM:
Actually, I wonder if people use any srfi much?
Some people still use SRFIs with Racket (I don't anymore), but usually
Racket has somewhat better comparable features separate from SRFIs,
either built-in
At Wed, 04 Apr 2012 09:58:32 +0200, Rüdiger Asche wrote:
> when raco exe is used to create a standalone .exe and I try to run the
> resulting exe from a DOS box with an empty path, the runtime support
> terminates with the message
>
> with-input-from-file: expects type as 1st argument,
> gi
Thank you, Matthew.
On quarta-feira, 4 de Abril de 2012 08:48:27, Matthew Flatt wrote:
At Tue, 03 Apr 2012 22:28:09 +0800, José Lopes wrote:
In MysterX, shouldn't two com-objects that are com-object-eq? also have
the same hash-code?
Good idea. I've made `com-object-eq?' imply `equal?' and the
Hi there,
when raco exe is used to create a standalone .exe and I try to run the
resulting exe from a DOS box with an empty path, the runtime support
terminates with the message
with-input-from-file: expects type as 1st argument,
given: #f;
other arguments were: #
=== context ===
embe
17 matches
Mail list logo
