On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 6:54 AM, Greg Hendershott
wrote:
> Plus I like the idea that the unit tests should include correctly
> running the examples in the docs. :)
Sounds like a great feature.
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://list
On 12/15/2011 06:05 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
Fix pushed.
Thanks! (That was amazingly quick.)
Regards,
Tony
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Neil Toronto wrote:
> On 12/15/2011 05:03 AM, Markku Rontu wrote:
>>
>> Named return values, ah the dream of symmetry.
>
> I think my mad-scientist advisor did something like this once. I think it
> would be awesome to have this, and of course keyword arguments, as
At Thu, 15 Dec 2011 15:56:51 -0500, Tony Garnock-Jones wrote:
> Converting a number of alternative events into a single event by folding
> choice-evt over them one-at-a-time takes O(n^2) time.
Fix pushed.
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
On 12/15/2011 05:03 AM, Markku Rontu wrote:
Named return values, ah the dream of symmetry.
I think my mad-scientist advisor did something like this once. I think
it would be awesome to have this, and of course keyword arguments, as
first-class constructs in Racket.
(As far as I understand,
In DrRacket, Edit -> Preferences -> Editing -> General, uncheck "Enable
keybindings in menus"
This should give you most of the common emacs key bindings.
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 8:07 AM, mahaitao wrote:
> **
> I often use emacs for other editing works beside writing racket programs.
> *The que
Hi all,
Converting a number of alternative events into a single event by folding
choice-evt over them one-at-a-time takes O(n^2) time.
What should I do instead?
(apply choice-evt the-list) takes O(n) time, but is a bit annoying
because I have to maintain the intermediate list explicitly, and
This means that OpenGL on your system is not working correctly. I presume
that you are on Linux. You should consult this page to make sure you have
the correct libraries installed:
http://docs.racket-lang.org/gui/libs.html
Jay
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:41 AM, C.S.I. wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I
I often use emacs for other editing works beside writing racket programs.
*The question is how can I configure it to be emacs editing style such
as, Ctrl+n means
move to next line and so on.
Best regards
mht
*
_
For list-related administrative
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Zayr Okale wrote:
> Hello, everyone.
>
> Can someone please explain to me multiple return values? Not what it does,
> I understand that much, but what is this feature for? In what situations is
> it useful?
I am not sure how much usable values/call-with-values are in Scheme.
Hello all,
I tried to run Mccarthy's pyramidstack 1.0 and I get this error:
"send: target is not an object: #f for method: call-as-current".
I think it has something to do with the big-bang procedure, or with
the opengl libs, but I followed every advice I found without success.
Thanks in advance,
On Thu, 15 Dec 2011, Zayr Okale wrote:
> I even do understand what multiple return values are useful for in CL: "okay,
> the function calculates other potentially useful values anyway, so no reason
> not to make them available".
>
> Unfortunately, this scenario doesn't apply to Racket. And this i
Robby Findler wrote at 12/15/2011 09:45 AM:
It isn't exactly what you're asking for, as you don't learn versions
of the non-latest major version, but maybe that's still helpful?
Thanks, but I actually do need to the non-latest major version sometimes.
I think I'll just use one of the optio
You can visit this url:
http://planet.racket-lang.org/servlets/pkg-info.ss
It isn't exactly what you're asking for, as you don't learn versions
of the non-latest major version, but maybe that's still helpful?
I see it wasn't documented. I've just pushed docs for it:
-
If you want to find
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 7:54 AM, Greg Hendershott
wrote:
>
> Ideally it would be something like @examples/test-case[
> ], which strips off the check-* parts, and uses that
> as an expression for a normal Scribble example?
The following (totally untested, written in my email buffer) seems
like th
On 12/15/2011 12:39 PM, Zayr Okale wrote:
Unfortunately, this scenario doesn't apply to Racket. And this is exactly what
prompted my question. Since one of the reasons behind multiple return values
is, as David Van
Horn pointed out, symmetry with multiple input values (function arguments),
th
I'm trying to finish a couple PLaneT packages. Want to contribute
something back, finally. (One is a package for quite a few Amazon Web
Services, including S3, SES, SDB, SQS, SNS, and CloudWatch. The other
is an HTTP 1.1 library, only because I want some 1.1-ness for the
former.)
Although I'm nerv
Named return values, ah the dream of symmetry.
-Markku
- Reply message -
From: "Zayr Okale"
To: "Tomasz Rola"
Cc:
Subject: [racket] Multiple return values
Date: Thu, Dec 15, 2011 13:39
On 14/12/2011 21:20, Tomasz Rola wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Zayr Okale wrote:
>
>> Hello, everyo
On 14/12/2011 21:20, Tomasz Rola wrote:
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Zayr Okale wrote:
Hello, everyone.
Can someone please explain to me multiple return values? Not what it does,
I understand that much, but what is this feature for? In what situations is
it useful?
I am not sure how much usable value
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14-12-11 21:19, Harry Spier wrote:
> Dear list members,
>
> In the Racket Guide 16.1.7 Extended Example: Call-by-Reference
> Functions it shows how with macros to set up call by reference
> versions of Racket functions.
>
> I'm a little bit conf
20 matches
Mail list logo
